Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
County Administrative Board of Norrbotten (2001)
Byggnadsminnesförklaring av Kiruna stadshus, Tätörten 3, Kiruna stad och kommun (Listing of the Town Hall in the town of Kiruna under the Heritage Conservation Act)
County Administrative Board of Norrbotten (2011)
Delbeslut om tillstånd till att flytta Hjalmar Lundbohmsgården inom Kiruna stad, i och med stadsomvandlingen, Fjällrosen 1, Kiruna stad och kommun (Decision on permission to move Hjalmar Lundbohmsgården within the town of Kiruna due to the urban transformation)
Kiruna Council (1984)
Bevarandeplan Kiruna C. Antaget av kommunfullmäktige 1984-09-10, § 210 (Conservation plan for the town of Kiruna)
Hans-Henrik Egede-Nissen (2014)
Autentisitetens relevans : på sporet av et endret fokus for kulturminnevernet
Kiruna Council and LKAB (2010)
Begäran om upphävande och förändring av byggnadsminnen (Request to repeal and change listed buildings)
Situation Kiruna (2012)
Situation Kiruna: Ett blad om Kirunas stadsomvandling (Situation Kiruna: A leaflet about Kiruna’s urban transformation)
Administrative Court of Appeal in Sundsvall (2014)
Förvaltningsrätten i Luleås dom den 7 maj 2013 i mål nr 901-12 (Administrative Court in Luleå's verdict 7 May 2013)
J. Tunbridge, G. Ashworth (1995)
Dissonant Heritage: The Management of the Past as a Resource in Conflict
Kiruna Council and Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara AB (2011)
Avtal angående Gruvstadsparken del 1 m.m. (Agreement concerning Mine Town Park part 1)
Kiruna Council (2010)
Antagandehandling detaljplan för Bolagsområdet, Gruvstadspark, Kiruna kommun (Adopted detailed development plan, the Company Area, Mine Town Park, in the town of Kiruna)
Kiruna Council (2009)
Samrådshandling detaljplan för Bolagsområdet, Gruvstadspark, Kiruna kommun (Draft consultation detailed development plan, the Company Area, Mine Town Park, in the town of Kiruna)
Kiruna Council (2006)
Fördjupad översiktsplan för Kiruna centralort (Detailed comprehensive plan for the town of Kiruna)
P. Gazzola (1964)
The Venice Charter: International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites
UNESCO (2004)
Dresden Elbe Valley
LKAB (2013)
Angående Hjalmar Lundbohmsgården, utgående brev till Kiruna kommun, beteckning 13-52 (Letter to Kiruna Council, concerning Hjalmar Lundbohmsgården)
ÅF-Infraplan and Wilhelmson arkitekter LKAB (2006)
Nya Kiruna (New Kiruna)
County Administrative Board of Norrbotten (2012)
Beslut om jämkning av skyddsbestämmelser och tillstånd till ändring av byggnadsminnet Kiruna stadshus, Tätörten 3, Kiruna stad och kommun (Decision to adjust protective regulations and permission to alter the listed building the Town Hall in Kiruna)
Jim Johnson (2000)
Rebuilding of a Historic Polish Town: ‘Retroversion’ in ActionJournal of Architectural Conservation, 6
J. Gregory (2008)
Reconsidering Relocated Buildings: ICOMOS, Authenticity and Mass Relocation 1International Journal of Heritage Studies, 14
Kiruna Council (2008)
Kulturmiljöanalys Kiruna etapp 1 (Cultural heritage analysis part 1)
National Identities, 8
Kiruna Council (2010)
Bedömning av kulturvärden för byggnader inom Gruvstadsparken: Del av miljökonsekvensbeskrivning till detaljplan för del av Bolaget, Gruvstadspark (Assessment of heritage values in buildings within the Mine Town Park: part of the environmental impact assessment of the detailed development plan for part of the Company Area, the town of Kiruna)
Kiruna Council (2004)
Vi ska flytta en stad (We will move a town)
Knut Larsen, N. Marstein (1994)
Conference on authenticity in relation to the world heritage convention : Preparatory workshop, Bergen, Norway, 31 January - 2 February 1994
National Heritage Board (1990)
Riksintressanta miljöer i Sverige: förteckning: underlag för tillämpning av naturresurslagen 2 kap 6§ (Environments of national interest in Sweden: listing)
H. Stovel (2001)
The Riga Charter on Authenticity and Historical Reconstruction in Relationship to Cultural Heritage: Riga, Latvia, October 2000Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 4
County Administrative Board of Norrbotten (2001)
Byggnadsminnesförklaring av Hjalmar Lundbohmsgården, Fjällrosen 1, Kiruna stad och kommun (Listing of the Hjalmar Lundbohmsgården in the town of Kiruna under the Heritage Conservation Act)
Laurajane Smith (2020)
Uses of HeritageEncyclopedia of Global Archaeology
Administrative Court in Luleå (2013)
Länsstyrelsens i Norrbottens län beslut den 4 April 2012 (County Administrative Board of Norrbotten’s decision of 4 April 2012)
ICOMOS (1964)
International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (The Venice Charter 1964) (Homepage of ICOMOS)
LKAB (2006)
Fördjupad översiktsplan för Kiruna centralort – LKABs synpunkter på Kiruna kommuns samrådshandling mars 2006, Beteckning TQM06-01 (LKAB’s consultation report on the detailed comprehensive plan for the town of Kiruna)
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate how different notions about the conservation of built heritage develop in a situation of structural change that demands either the demolition or relocation of a large number of historic buildings.Design/methodology/approachThe analysis is based on a case study of the on-going urban transformation of the Swedish mining town Kiruna. The investigation was based on the text analysis of urban planning documents and media reporting, which was used to distinguish stakeholders’ positions towards conservation based on authenticity aspects.FindingsThe conservation goals of the urban planning process are unclear and the stakeholders have conceptually different views regarding which parts of the town’s built heritage are of significance, which negatively affects the ability to make well informed, transparent and intelligible management decisions. Stakeholder views on the management of built heritage span from the relocation of a few, single historic buildings to maintaining the integrity of the town as a heritage site by moving a significant number of buildings.Research limitations/implicationsThe Kiruna case, being exceptional because conservation in situ is impossible, has the potential to highlight the relation between single historic buildings and the integrity of an urban heritage site, as well as implications for conservation on the urban scale.Originality/valueThis investigation contributes to knowledge of built heritage in situations of structural change, which is of concern for planning and conservation practice. Currently, many urban areas are under pressure of transformations or destruction.
Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 15, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.