Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Audit committee oversight of external audit: an examination of structural power and behavioural tactics

Audit committee oversight of external audit: an examination of structural power and behavioural... This study aims to examine the structural power wielded by the audit committee (AC) and the various bases of its power, whilst also exploring the behavioural tactics used by the AC to leverage its power in the oversight of the external audit.Design/methodology/approachEmpirical evidence was drawn from semi-structured interviews with external auditors and AC members in Malaysia.FindingsThe AC’s structural power is derived from its formal and network position in the organisation. The AC possesses three forms of organisational-based power (legitimate, coercive and informational) resultant from its formal position, and these combine with the AC’s personal power (will and expert). The AC uses its personal power base to develop trusting relationships and to promote the exchange of information with other key corporate governance actors in the network position. Furthermore, the AC applies at least four behavioural tactics (assertiveness, ingratiation, rationality and coalition formation) to exercise its bases of power.Originality/valueThis study attempts to describe the AC’s structural sources of power, its organisational and personal power bases, and the behavioural tactics it uses when exerting its power. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Meditari Accountancy Research Emerald Publishing

Audit committee oversight of external audit: an examination of structural power and behavioural tactics

Download PDF
23 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/audit-committee-oversight-of-external-audit-an-examination-of-VX8dqbbEqW
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2049-372X
eISSN
2049-372X
DOI
10.1108/medar-12-2019-0630
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This study aims to examine the structural power wielded by the audit committee (AC) and the various bases of its power, whilst also exploring the behavioural tactics used by the AC to leverage its power in the oversight of the external audit.Design/methodology/approachEmpirical evidence was drawn from semi-structured interviews with external auditors and AC members in Malaysia.FindingsThe AC’s structural power is derived from its formal and network position in the organisation. The AC possesses three forms of organisational-based power (legitimate, coercive and informational) resultant from its formal position, and these combine with the AC’s personal power (will and expert). The AC uses its personal power base to develop trusting relationships and to promote the exchange of information with other key corporate governance actors in the network position. Furthermore, the AC applies at least four behavioural tactics (assertiveness, ingratiation, rationality and coalition formation) to exercise its bases of power.Originality/valueThis study attempts to describe the AC’s structural sources of power, its organisational and personal power bases, and the behavioural tactics it uses when exerting its power.

Journal

Meditari Accountancy Research – Emerald Publishing

Published: Nov 23, 2022

Keywords: Power bases; Audit committee effectiveness; Behavioural tactics; Oversight duties; Structural power

References

  • Auditor selection and audit committee characteristics
    Abbott, L.J.; Parker, S.
  • Audit committee characteristics and restatements
    Abbott, L.J.; Parker, S.; Peters, G.F.
  • Board, audit committee, culture and earnings management: Malaysian evidence
    Abdul Rahman, R.; Ali, F.H.M.
  • Governance structure, ownership structure and earnings predictability: Malaysian evidence
    Al-Dhamari, R.A.; Ku-Ismail, N.I.K.
  • Internal and external audit attributes, audit committee characteristics, ownership concentration and earnings quality: evidence from Malaysia
    Al-Rassas, A.H.; Kamardin, H.
  • Audit committee, internal audit function and earnings management: evidence from Jordan
    Alzoubi, E.S.S.
  • Structural sources of intraorganisational power: a theoretical synthesis
    Astley, G.W.; Sachdeva, D.S.
  • The audit committee oversight process
    Beasley, M.S.; Carcello, J.V.; Hermanson, D.R.; Neal, T.L.
  • The effect of audit committee expertise, independence and activity on aggressive earnings management
    Bédard, J.; Chtourou, S.M.; Courteau, L.
  • Power base’ tactics for workplace change – an interview study with industrial engineers and ergonomists
    Berlin, C.; Neumann, W.P.; Theberge, N.; Örtengren, R.
  • Problem-solving or self-enhancement? A power perspective on how CEOs affect R&D search in the face of inconsistent feedback
    Blagoeva, R.R.; Mom, T.J.; Jansen, J.J.; George, G.
  • Board characteristics, audit committee characteristics and abnormal accruals
    Bradbury, M.; Mak, Y.T.; Tan, S.M.
  • Potential power and power use: an investigation of structure and behavior
    Brass, D.; Burkhardt, M.E.
  • Audit committees: practices, practitioners and praxis of governance
    Brennan, N.M.; Kirwan, C.E.
  • Behavioral implications of big data’s impact on audit judgment and decision making and future research directions
    Brown-Liburd, H.; Issa, H.; Lombardi, D.
  • Board characteristics and audit fees
    Carcello, J.V.; Hermanson, D.R.; Riley, R.A.
  • The corporate governance mosaic and financial reporting quality
    Cohen, J.R.; Krishnamoorthy, G.; Wright, A.
  • Corporate governance in the Post-Sarbanes-Oxley era: auditors’ experiences
    Cohen, J.R.; Krishnamoorthy, G.; Wright, A.
  • Corporate governance and the audit process
    Cohen, J.R.; Krishnamoorthy, G.; Wright, A.M.
  • Form versus substance: the implications for auditing practice and research of alternative perspectives on corporate governance
    Cohen, J.R.; Krishnamoorthy, G.; Wright, A.M.
  • The effect of audit committee industry expertise on monitoring the financial reporting process
    Cohen, J.R.; Hoitash, U.; Krishnamoorthy, G.; Wright, A.M.
  • Communication of the external auditor with the audit committee: managing impressions to deal with multiple accountability relationships
    Compernolle, T.
  • The audit committee as an interactive process: insights on the AC chairperson’s power
    Compernolle, T.; Richard, C.
  • Audit committee member support for proposed audit adjustments: a source credibility perspective
    DeZoort, F.T.; Hermanson, D.R.; Houston, R.W.
  • Audit committee effectiveness: a synthesis of the empirical audit committee literature
    DeZoort, F.T.; Hermanson, D.R.; Archambeault, D.S.; Reed, S.A.
  • Exploring audit committee practices: oversight of financial reporting and external auditors in Poland
    Dobija, D.
  • The effect of audit committee composition and structure on the performance of audit committees
    Ferreira, I.
  • The bases of social power
    French, J.R.P.; Raven, B.; Cartwright, D.
  • On the role of the organization in auditors' client-acceptance decisions”, accounting
    Gendron, Y.
  • Discussion of ‘the audit committee oversight process’: advocating openness in accounting research
    Gendron, Y.
  • On the constitution of audit committee effectiveness”, accounting
    Gendron, Y.; Bédard, J.
  • Getting inside the black box: a field study of practices in ‘effective’ audit committees
    Gendron, Y.; Bédard, J.; Gosselin, M.
  • Audit committee chair’s legal expertise and real activities manipulation: empirical evidence from malaysian energy and utilities sectors
    Ghaleb, B.; Al-Duais, S.D.; Abdulwahid, A.H.
  • The relation between external audit fees, audit committee characteristics and internal audit
    Goodwin-Stewart, J.; Kent, P.
  • How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability
    Guest, G.; Bunce, A.; Johnson, L.
  • Audit quality indicators: perspectives from non-big four audit firms and small company audit committee
    Harris, M.K.; Williams, L.T.
  • The compensation committee process
    Hermanson, D.R.; Tompkins, J.G.; Veliyath, R.; Ye, Z.
  • Audit committee effectiveness: an empirical investigation of the contribution of power
    Kalbers, L.P.; Fogarty, T.J.
  • Power dynamics in negotiation
    Kim, P.H.; Pinkley, R.L.; Fragale, A.R.
  • An influence perspective on bargaining
    Kipnis, D.; Schmidt, S.; Bazerman, M.; Lewicki, R.
  • Upward-influence styles: relationship with performance evaluation, salary, and stress
    Kipnis, D.; Schmidt, S.M.
  • Audit quality: insights from the academic literature
    Knechel, W.R.; Krishnan, G.V.; Pevzner, M.; Shefchik, L.B.; Velury, U.K.
  • The supply of corporate directors and board independence
    Knyazeva, A.; Knyazeva, D.; Masulis, R.W.
  • Developing corporate governance research through qualitative methods: a review of previous studies
    McNulty, T.; Zattoni, A.; Douglas, T.
  • Internal auditor perceptions on audit committee interactions: a qualitative study in Malaysian public corporations
    Mat Zain, M.; Subramaniam, N.
  • Female audit committee directorship and audit fees
    Mnif Sellami, Y.; Cherif, I.
  • Former audit partners on the audit committee and internal control deficiencies
    Naiker, V.; Sharma, D.S.
  • Power in a startup's relationships with its established partners: interactions between structural and behavioural power
    Oukes, T.; Von Raesfeld, A.; Groen, A.
  • Audit committee role: formal rituals or effective oversight process?
    Oussii, A.A.; Klibi, M.F.; Ouertani, I.
  • The comparative analysis of power and power references
    Raven, B.H.; Tadeschi, J.T.
  • The role of the audit committee in resolving auditor-client disagreements: a Malaysian study
    Salleh, Z.; Stewart, J.
  • Malaysian code of corporate governance
  • Corporate governance monitor 2019
  • Oversight of audit quality in the UK: insights into audit committee conduct
    Sulaiman, N.A.
  • Experience of audit committee members and audit quality
    Sultana, N.; Singh, H.; Rahman, A.
  • Governance prescriptions under trial: on the interplay between the logics of resistance and compliance in audit committees
    Tremblay, M.S.; Gendron, Y.
  • The corporate governance effects of audit committees
    Turley, S.; Zaman, M.
  • Audit committee effectiveness: informal processes and behavioural effects
    Turley, S.; Zaman, M.
  • The perceived effectiveness of audit committees in the South african public service
    Van Der Nest, D.P.
  • Effect of audit committee independence, board ethnicity and family ownership on earnings management in Malaysia
    Mohammad, W.M.W.; Wasiuzzaman, S.
  • Domination by economic power and by authority
    Weber, M.; Lukes, S.
  • ‘The persistent myth of lost hegemony’, revisited: structural power as a complex network phenomenon
    Winecoff, W.K.
  • Effectiveness of corporate governance mechanisms: a review of the literature
    Yasin, F.M.; Muhamad, R.; Sulaiman, N.A.
  • Audit committee chairman characteristics and earnings management: the influence of family chairman
    Al-Absy, M.S.M.; Ku Ismail, K.N.I.; Chandren, S.
  • Malaysian code of corporate governance
  • Malaysian code of corporate governance
  • Malaysian code of corporate governance