Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Y. Yeşilada, G. Brajnik, Markel Vigo, S. Harper (2012)
Understanding web accessibility and its drivers
Nancy Alajarmeh (2021)
The extent of mobile accessibility coverage in WCAG 2.1: sufficiency of success criteria and appropriateness of relevant conformance levels pertaining to accessibility problems encountered by users who are visually impairedUniversal Access in the Information Society, 21
Christopher Power, A. Freire, H. Petrie, David Swallow (2012)
Guidelines are only half of the story: accessibility problems encountered by blind users on the webProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Iris Xie, Soohyung Joo, Krystyna Matusiak (2020)
Digital library evaluation measures in academic settings: Perspectives from scholars and practitionersJournal of Librarianship and Information Science, 53
E. Velleman, I. Nahuis, T. Geest (2015)
Factors explaining adoption and implementation processes for web accessibility standards within eGovernment systems and organizationsUniversal Access in the Information Society, 16
Y. Yeşilada, G. Brajnik, Markel Vigo, S. Harper (2015)
Exploring perceptions of web accessibility: a survey approachBehaviour & Information Technology, 34
Raphael Clegg-Vinell, Christopher Bailey, V. Gkatzidou (2014)
Investigating the appropriateness and relevance of mobile web accessibility guidelines
Ying Zhang (2010)
Developing a holistic model for digital library evaluationJ. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 61
Rocío Calvo, Faezeh Seyedarabi, A. Savva (2016)
Beyond Web Content Accessibility Guidelines: Expert Accessibility ReviewsProceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion
A. Bai, V. Stray, Heidi Mork (2019)
What Methods Software Teams Prefer When Testing Web AccessibilityAdv. Hum. Comput. Interact., 2019
Vashanth Selvadurai, Peter Vistisen, C. Rosenstand (2019)
Fruitful Gaps in Digital Literacy: Interpreting gaps in digital literacy among stakeholders in collaborative design research projects as an evolving innovative capacityThe Design Journal, 22
David Kreps, M. Goff (2015)
Code in action: Closing the black box of WCAG 2.0, A Latourian reading of Web accessibilityFirst Monday, 20
Fang Xu, J. Du (2019)
Examining differences and similarities between graduate and undergraduate students' user satisfaction with digital librariesThe Journal of Academic Librarianship
P. Ngimwa, A. Adams (2013)
The different roles of ‘Design Process Champions’ for digital libraries in African higher educationInternational Journal on Digital Libraries, 13
H. Petrie, Christopher Power, David Swallow, Carlos Velasco, Blaithin Gallagher, M. Magennis, Emma Murphy, Sam Collin, Keren Down (2011)
The value chain for web accessibility : challenges and opportunities
P. García, David Martín-Moncunill, Carlos Marin (2017)
Trends and challenges of visual search interfaces in digital libraries and repositoriesElectron. Libr., 35
Iris Xie, Rakesh Babu, Melissa Castillo, H. Han (2018)
Identification of factors associated with blind users' help‐seeking situations in interacting with digital librariesJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69
Sharon Snider, Willie Scott, Shari Trewin (2020)
Accessibility Information Needs in the EnterpriseACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS), 12
Yuelin Li, Chang Liu (2019)
Information Resource, Interface, and Tasks as User Interaction Components for Digital Library EvaluationInf. Process. Manag., 56
G. Brajnik, Y. Yeşilada, S. Harper (2012)
Is accessibility conformance an elusive property? A study of validity and reliability of WCAG 2.0ACM Trans. Access. Comput., 4
Jingdong Jia, Luiz Capretz (2017)
Direct and mediating influences of user-developer perception gaps in requirements understanding on user participationRequirements Engineering, 23
Shari Trewin, Brian Cragun, C. Swart, J. Brezin, J. Richards (2010)
Accessibility challenges and tool features: an IBM Web developer perspective
Tânia Frazão, Carlos Duarte (2020)
Comparing accessibility evaluation plug-insProceedings of the 17th International Web for All Conference
R. Mátrai (2018)
How to make an electronic library accessibleElectron. Libr., 36
G. Brajnik, Y. Yeşilada, S. Harper (2011)
The Expertise Effect on Web Accessibility Evaluation MethodsHuman–Computer Interaction, 26
Hayfa.Y. Abuaddous, M. Jali, N. Basir (2016)
Web Accessibility ChallengesInternational Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 7
J. Cheoh, Behzad Beigpourian, Siqing Wei, D. Ferguson, M. Ohland (2020)
Examining the Perceptions of People with Disabilities on the Use of Accessibility Standards in Web Interface Design2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)
Dagfinn Rømen, Dag Svanæs (2012)
Validating WCAG versions 1.0 and 2.0 through usability testing with disabled usersUniversal Access in the Information Society, 11
Glen Farrelly (2011)
Practitioner barriers to diffusion and implementation of web accessibilityTechnology and Disability, 23
Waqar Haider, Y. Yeşilada (2020)
Tables on the web accessible?: unfortunately not!Proceedings of the 17th International Web for All Conference
David Swallow, H. Petrie, Christopher Power (2016)
Understanding and Supporting Web Developers: Design and Evaluation of a Web Accessibility Information Resource (WebAIR)Studies in health technology and informatics, 229
Y. Tu, Gwo-jen Hwang, Chiu-Lin Lai (2021)
Facilitating learning by the visually impaired: development and usability evaluation of a specially designed ubiquitous libraryElectron. Libr., 39
Rohan Patel, Pedro Breton, C. Baker, Yasmine El-Glaly, Kristen Shinohara (2020)
Why Software is Not Accessible: Technology Professionals' Perspectives and ChallengesExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
W. Watanabe, Renata Fortes, A. Dias (2015)
Acceptance tests for validating ARIA requirements in widgetsUniversal Access in the Information Society, 16
Iris Xie, Rakesh Babu, Tae Lee, Shengang Wang, Hyun Lee (2021)
Coping tactics of blind and visually impaired users: Responding to help-seeking situations in the digital library environmentInf. Process. Manag., 58
Iris Xie, Rakesh Babu, Hyun Lee, Shengang Wang, Tae Lee (2021)
Orientation tactics and associated factors in the digital library environment: Comparison between blind and sighted usersJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72
Lucas Colusso, Cynthia Bennett, Gary Hsieh, Sean Munson (2017)
Translational Resources: Reducing the Gap Between Academic Research and HCI PracticeProceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems
Iris Xie, Soohyung Joo, Krystyna Matusiak (2018)
Multifaceted Evaluation Criteria of Digital Libraries in Academic Settings: Similarities and Differences From Different StakeholdersThe Journal of Academic Librarianship
M. Cooper, D. Sloan, B. Kelly, S. Lewthwaite (2012)
A challenge to web accessibility metrics and guidelines: putting people and processes first
O. Gaggi, Veronica Pederiva (2021)
WCAG4All, a tool for making web accessibility rules accessible2021 IEEE 18th Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC)
This study aims to investigate the perceptional differences of key stakeholders in assessing the Digital Library Accessibility and Usability Guidelines (DLAUG), in which design information is created and organized by types of help-seeking situations, to support blind and visually impaired (BVI) users. The stakeholders consist of BVI users, digital library (DL) developers and scholars/experts. The focus is on the identification of types of situations in which BVI users and developers show significant perception differences of DLAUG’s relevance, clarity and usefulness than the other two groups, respectively, and the associated reasons.Design/methodology/approachAn in-depth survey was conducted to examine the perceptions of 150 participants representing three groups of key DL stakeholders: BVI users, DL developers and scholars/experts. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses were applied.FindingsThe results show that BVI users and developers had significant perception differences of the relevance, clarity and usefulness of the DLAUG than the other two groups held on five situations, mainly because they played distinct roles in the development of DLs with differing goals and expectations for the DL design guidelines.Originality/valueThis is the first study that considers different DL stakeholders to assess DL guidelines to support BVI users.
The Electronic Library – Emerald Publishing
Published: Nov 29, 2022
Keywords: Assessment; Guidelines; Blind and visually impaired users; Digital library design; Stakeholders
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.