Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Hughes (1987)
Cerebral lateralization: biological mechanisms, associations and pathologyElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 67
(2000)
Facilitator’s Guide to Learning, Hay/McBer
M. Pugach, L. Johnson (1994)
Collaborative Practitioners, Collaborative Schools
Franck Coffield, David Moseley, Elaine Hall, K. Ecclestone (2004)
Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning
L. Pinfield (1986)
A Field Evaluation of Perspectives on Organizational Decision Making.Administrative Science Quarterly, 31
A. Boer (1999)
Thinking Style Preferences of Underprepared First Year Students in the Natural SciencesSouth African Journal of Ethnology, 22
R. Krejcie, D. Morgan (1970)
Determining Sample Size for Research ActivitiesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 30
Ali Bawaneh, A. Zain, S. Saleh (2010)
Investigating tenth grade Jordanian Students' thinking styles based on Herrmann's Whole Brain Model for the purpose of developing new teaching method in modifying science misconceptionsEducational Research, 1
K. Trigwell, M. Prosser, Fiona Waterhouse (1999)
Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learningHigher Education, 37
T. Buzan (1976)
Use both sides of your brain
P. Anderson (1983)
Decision Making by Objection and the Cuban Missile CrisisAdministrative Science Quarterly, 28
J. Beaumont (1987)
Cerebral lateralization: Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology N. Geschwind and A.M. Galaburda (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.) pp. ix + 283, $29.95Biological Psychology, 25
M. Knowles (1979)
The adult learner : a neglected speciesEducational Researcher, 8
J. Bauwens, J. Hourcade, M. Friend (1989)
Cooperative TeachingRemedial and Special Education, 10
(2005)
SWOT Analysis”, available at http://rapidbi.com/swotanalysis/ (accessed
(2009)
The Brave “New” World of Education: Creating a New Professionalism, Juta
R. Hyman, Barbara Rosoff (1984)
Matching learning and teaching styles: The jug and what's in itTheory Into Practice, 23
K. Eisenhardt (1989)
Building theories from case study researchSTUDI ORGANIZZATIVI
(2002)
Manual of the learning preferences profiler
R. Dunn, S. Griggs (1988)
Learning Styles: Quiet Revolution in American Secondary Schools
L. Adams, K. Cessna (1991)
Designing Systems to Facilitate Collaboration: Collective Wisdom From ColoradoPreventing School Failure, 35
Ned Herrmann (1996)
The Whole Brain Business Book
(2010)
The brave 'new' world of education : creating a unique professionalism, Johannes A. Slabbert, Dorothea de Kock, Annemarie Hattingh : book review
R. Gardner, H. Witkin, R. Dyk, H. Faterson, D. Goodenough, S. Karp (1963)
Psychological Differentiation: Studies of DevelopmentAmerican Journal of Psychology, 76
J. Kagan (1966)
Reflection--impulsivity: the generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo.Journal of abnormal psychology, 71 1
(1998)
Twenty years of thinking about the thinking brain: a special summary of learning outcomes
A. Boer, T. Steyn, P. Toit (2001)
A whole brain approach to teaching and learning in higher educationSouth African journal of higher education, 15
J. Shelnutt, S. Middleton, Kim Buch, M. Lumsdaine (1996)
Forming Student Project Teams Based On Hermann Brain Dominance (Hbdi) Results
L. Curry, C. Adams (1991)
Patterns of Learning Style Across Selected Medical SpecialtiesEducational Psychology, 11
(1995)
The Creative Brain, 2nd ed., Quebecor Printing
R. Dunn, K. Dunn (1975)
Learning Styles, Teaching StylesNASSP Bulletin, 59
D. Fuchs, L. Fuchs (1992)
Limitations of a Feel-Good Approach to ConsultationJournal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 3
de Boer, Van Berg (2001)
THE VALUE OF THE HERRMANN BRAIN DOMINANCE INSTRUMENT (HBDI) IN FACILITATING EFFECTIVE TEACHING AND LEARNING OF CRIMINOLOGYActa Criminologica: Southern African Journal of Criminology, 14
H. Gardner, Thomas Hatch (1989)
Multiple Intelligences Go to School: Educational Implications of the Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Technical Report No. 4.
I. Myers (1985)
Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
(1988)
The dimensionality and occupational discriminating power of the Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument
R. Ornstein (1997)
The right mind : making sense of the hemispheres
R. Felder (2004)
MATTERS OF STYLE
A. Boer, T. Bothma (2003)
Thinking styles and their role in teaching and learning
B. Robinson, Robert Schaible (1995)
Collaborative Teaching: Reaping the BenefitsCollege Teaching, 43
H. Gardner, Thomas Hatch (1989)
Educational Implications of the Theory of Multiple IntelligencesEducational Researcher, 18
P. Howell (1991)
Taking AIM to Assist Middle School Students With Special NeedsPreventing School Failure, 35
A. White, Lynda White (1992)
A Collaborative Model for Students with Mild Disabilities in Middle Schools.Focus on Exceptional Children, 24
N. Elson (1983)
Aspects of Teaching and Learning., 14
(1989)
The Creative Brain, Brain Books, Lake Lure, NC
S. Messick (1984)
The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practiceEducational Psychologist, 19
(1995)
Thinking styles”, in Saklofske
P. Gerber, Patricia Popp (2000)
Making Collaborative Teaching More Effective for Academically Able Students: Recommendations for Implementation and TrainingLearning Disability Quarterly, 23
S. Springer, G. Deutsch (1981)
Left brain, right brain
Purpose– This paper aims to focus on the thinking styles of a group of Accounting students, and to determine whether team teaching by two criteria-specific lecturers can be an effective collaborative teaching approach to accommodate students’ diverse learning preferences. Research on thinking and learning processes led to a four-quadrant whole-brain model of people’s thinking styles and associated learning preferences. The model can be used to identify and accommodate students’ diverse thinking styles and learning preferences. Design/methodology/approach– A case study approach was followed, using multiple data collection methods. The thinking styles of 288 students and two lecturers were surveyed using a thinking style questionnaire and the Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument. The results of the collaborative teaching approach were obtained by way of a survey questionnaire providing both quantitative and qualitative feedback, as well as a SWOT analysis completed by the involved lecturers. Findings– The main results suggest that a collaborative teaching approach can address students’ diverse learning preferences, although some students may find constant switching between lecturers distracting. Research limitations/implications– The collaborative teaching approach in the teaching interaction cannot be isolated. Collaborative teaching was not repeated or extended due to resource constraints. Originality/value– Academics from all disciplines recognise a need for a teaching practice that addresses students’ diverse learning preferences. Hitherto, outside of special education, collaborative teaching has received little scholarly attention, especially as an approach to address tertiary students’ diverse learning preferences.
Meditari Accountancy Research – Emerald Publishing
Published: Nov 11, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.