Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Tyler (1999)
Historic Preservation: An Introduction to Its History, Principles, and Practice
J. Ruskin (1849)
The Seven Lamps of Architecture
Urban Design International [US]
F. Bandarin, R. Oers (2014)
Reconnecting the city : the historic urban landscape approach and the future of urban heritage
S. Loew (1998)
Modern Architecture in Historic Cities: Policy, Planning and Building in Contemporary France
R. Bert (2009)
\IHistoric Preservation: An Introduction to Its History, Principles, and Practice\N by Norman Tyler, Ted J. Ligibel, and Ilene Tyler. New York City: W.W. Norton, 2009.Civil Engineering, 79
Marie Huber (2016)
Christina Cameron, Mechtild Rössler: Many Voices, One Vision. The Early Years of the World Heritage Convention. Farnham, Surrey 2013. - geschichte.transnational / Rezensionen / Bücher
UNESCO World Heritage Centre (2013)
International world heritage expert meeting on visual integrity: background document
Roha Khalaf (2015)
THE RECONCILIATION OF HERITAGE CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT: The Success of Criteria in Guiding the Design and Assessment of Contemporary Interventions in Historic PlacesInternational Journal of Architectural Research: Archnet-IJAR, 9
Roha Khalaf (2013)
An approach to compatible new buildings in historic urban environments : case study in the Arabian Gulf region
Christina Cameron, Mechtild Rössler (2013)
Many Voices, One Vision: The Early Years of the World Heritage Convention
A. Papageorgiou-Venetas (1971)
Continuity and change: preservation in city planning
J. Jokilehto (2014)
Evolution of the Normative Framework
American Arts Quarterly Newington-Cropsey Cultural Studies Center, 25
José Jiménez (2011)
CHOAY, Françoise. Le Patrimoine en questions. Anthologie pour un combat. París: Èditions du Seuil, 2009.
J. Fitch (1985)
HISTORIC PRESERVATION: CURATORIAL MANAGEMENT OF THE BUILT WORLDLandscape Journal, 4
R. Oers (2014)
Conclusion: The Way Forward: An Agenda for Reconnecting the City
Roha Khalaf (2016)
The search for the meaning of ‘compatibility’ between new construction and heritage in historic areas: an exploratory studyThe Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 7
Keith Ray (1980)
Contextual architecture : responding to existing style
J. Bold, R. Pickard (2013)
Reconstructing Europe: The Need for GuidelinesThe Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 4
J. Cramer, Stefan Breitling (2007)
Architecture in existing fabric : planning, design, building
Conservation Perspectives, The Getty Conservation Newsletter on Historic Cities, 26
UNESCO World Heritage Centre (2012)
International world heritage expert meeting on integrity for cultural heritage: background document on the notion of integrity
R. Bert (2009)
\IThe Future of the Past: A Conservation Ethic for Architecture, Urbanism, and Historic Preservation\N by Steven W. Semes. New York City: W.W. Norton & Company, 2009.Civil Engineering, 79
J. Irwin (2002)
Historic Preservation Handbook
PurposeThis paper revisits the concept of compatibility between old and new architecture to clarify its meaning.Design/methodology/approachDocument analysis is employed to critically review relevant literature, including Charters and UNESCO Recommendations.FindingsVisual and/or tangible indicators such as forms and materials are often suggested in the literature to determine compatibility and to inform decision makers whether new architectural projects should reproduce, or reinterpret, or rather contrast with, historic buildings in situ. As a consequence, compatible design becomes confined to a visual, object-based, worldview. Yet, architecture transcends the sense of vision.Research limitations/implicationsExamples of architectural projects are given to explain each design option, but are not thoroughly described. Still, this paper provides a useful reference for future dialogue and research that aim at reducing the conservation vs development struggle in historic places, whether urban areas or entire cities, such as World Heritage Cities.Practical implicationsThe lessons learned may stimulate reflection on the effectiveness of design criteria and other tools in guiding decision makers in their search for, and assessment of, compatibility.Originality/valueThis paper reveals that compatibility is an evolving concept, associated with human, man-made and natural indicators. Design options are not simply aesthetic categories. The author proposes that the selection of a design option for new architecture should follow the process that guides the selection of a conservation treatment for old architecture.
Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development – Emerald Publishing
Published: Nov 21, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.