Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Analyzing the law qualitatively

Analyzing the law qualitatively This article develops a methodological framework to support qualitative analyses of legal texts. Scholars across the social sciences and humanities use qualitative methods to study legal phenomena but often overlook formal legal texts as productive sites for analysis. Moreover, when qualitative researchers do analyze legal texts, they rarely discuss the methodological underpinnings that support their approach. A thorough consideration of the methodological underpinnings of qualitative approaches to legal analysis is therefore warranted.Design/methodology/approachBy bringing critical legal theory into conversation with qualitative methodology, this article outlines a set of key principles to inform qualitative approaches to reading the law.FindingsTo construct this methodological framework, this article first distinguishes between qualitative approaches to textual analysis and the doctrinal approaches undertaken in legal practice and formal legal scholarship. It then considers how this qualitative approach might be applied to one particular genre of legal text: namely, judicial opinions, otherwise known as reasons for judgment. In doing so, it argues that robust qualitative analyses of legal texts must consider the unique characteristics of those texts, such as their distinct form, voice, rhetorical structure, and performative capabilities.Originality/valueThe methodological framework outlined here should encourage qualitative researchers to approach legal texts more readily and challenge the hegemony of doctrinal approaches to legal interpretation in social science research. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Qualitative Research Journal Emerald Publishing

Analyzing the law qualitatively

Mitchell, Matthew
Qualitative Research Journal , Volume 23 (1): 12 – Jan 4, 2023
Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/analyzing-the-law-qualitatively-0Tm96Mm2BU
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1443-9883
DOI
10.1108/qrj-04-2022-0061
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This article develops a methodological framework to support qualitative analyses of legal texts. Scholars across the social sciences and humanities use qualitative methods to study legal phenomena but often overlook formal legal texts as productive sites for analysis. Moreover, when qualitative researchers do analyze legal texts, they rarely discuss the methodological underpinnings that support their approach. A thorough consideration of the methodological underpinnings of qualitative approaches to legal analysis is therefore warranted.Design/methodology/approachBy bringing critical legal theory into conversation with qualitative methodology, this article outlines a set of key principles to inform qualitative approaches to reading the law.FindingsTo construct this methodological framework, this article first distinguishes between qualitative approaches to textual analysis and the doctrinal approaches undertaken in legal practice and formal legal scholarship. It then considers how this qualitative approach might be applied to one particular genre of legal text: namely, judicial opinions, otherwise known as reasons for judgment. In doing so, it argues that robust qualitative analyses of legal texts must consider the unique characteristics of those texts, such as their distinct form, voice, rhetorical structure, and performative capabilities.Originality/valueThe methodological framework outlined here should encourage qualitative researchers to approach legal texts more readily and challenge the hegemony of doctrinal approaches to legal interpretation in social science research.

Journal

Qualitative Research Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jan 4, 2023

Keywords: Qualitative data analysis; Methodological theory; Socio-legal research methods; Legal judgments; Judicial opinions

References

  • The force of law: toward a sociology of the juridical field (R. Terdiman, trans.)
    Bourdieu, P.
  • Foreword: nomos and narrative
    Cover, R.M.
  • Violence and the word
    Cover, R.M.
  • Empirical research and the goals of legal scholarship: the rules of inference
    Epstein, L.; King, G.
  • Rhetorics of the judicial opinion
    Ferguson, R.
  • Feminist judgments projects at the intersection
    Gayoye, M.; Hunter, M.; Manji, A.; Matinda, M.; Sekalala, S.; Chaudhary, R.; Lammasniemi, L.; Munoth, S.; Prabhat, D.; Sen, J.; Black, G.; Cowan, S.; Kennedy, C.; Munro, V.E.
  • Improving the law reform process: opportunities for empirical qualitative research?
    Hanley, N.; Fileborn, B.; Larcombe, W.; Henry, N.; Powell, A.
  • Promoting the qualitative research approach in the discipline of forensic and legal medicine: why more qualitative work should be promoted and how that can be achieved
    Kennedy, K.M.
  • On the writing of judgments
    Kirby, M.
  • The structure of judicial opinions
    Leubsdorft, J.
  • Qualitative methods for law review writing
    Linos, K.; Carlson, M.
  • CLS stands for Critical Legal Studies, if anyone remembers
    Neacsu, E.D.
  • Styles of argumentation in judicial opinions (legitimating judicial decisions)
    Scurich, N.
  • Queering judgment: the case of gender identity fraud
    Sharpe, A.
  • Judicial decisions and judicial opinions: relations between law, justice, and morality
    Singer, M.G.
  • Rhetoric and its denial in legal discourse
    Wetlaufer, G.B.