Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Joseph Ntayi, Warren Byabashaija, Sarah Eyaa, Muhammed Ngoma, Alex Muliira (2010)
Social cohesion, groupthink and ethical behavior of public procurement officersJournal of Public Procurement, 10
T. Loe, L. Ferrell, Phylis Mansfield (2000)
A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making in BusinessJournal of Business Ethics, 25
J. Maciariello (2009)
Marketing and innovation in the Drucker Management SystemJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37
Michael Kramer, D. Dougherty (2013)
Groupthink as Communication Process, Not Outcome, 1
Zhiyan Gao, Songsong Ying, Jun Liu, Huiqiu Zhang, Jinxin Li, Changling Ma (2020)
A cross-sectional study: Comparing the attitude and knowledge of medical and non-medical students toward 2019 novel coronavirusJournal of Infection and Public Health, 13
A. Pescosolido (2003)
Group Efficacy And Group EffectivenessSmall Group Research, 34
P. Hart (1991)
Irving L. Janis' victims of groupthinkPolitical Psychology, 12
T. Simons, R. Peterson (1998)
Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust., 1998
S. Wangwe (2005)
CULTURE, IDENTITY AND SOCIAL INTEGRATION: THE TANZANIA EXPERIENCE IN SOCIAL INTEGRATION
Barbara Mutonyi, T. Slåtten, Gudbrand Lien (2020)
Empowering leadership, work group cohesiveness, individual learning orientation and individual innovative behaviour in the public sector: empirical evidence from NorwayInternational Journal of Public Leadership
A. Mori, E. Kaale, F. Ngalesoni, O. Norheim, B. Robberstad (2014)
The Role of Evidence in the Decision-Making Process of Selecting Essential Medicines in Developing Countries: The Case of TanzaniaPLoS ONE, 9
A. Carron, K. Spink, H. Prapavessis (1997)
Team building and cohesiveness in the sport and exercise setting: Use of indirect interventionsJournal of Applied Sport Psychology, 9
R. Mayer, J. Davis, F. Schoorman (1995)
An Integrative Model Of Organizational TrustAcademy of Management Review, 20
International Journal of Business and Management, 10
The Academy of Management Review, Academy of Management, 20
Robert Archer (2000)
The Place of Culture in Organization Theory: Introducing the Morphogenetic ApproachOrganization, 7
Claus Langfred (2004)
Too Much of a Good Thing? Negative Effects of High Trust and Individual Autonomy in Self-Managing TeamsAcademy of Management Journal, 47
M. Setia (2016)
Methodology Series Module 3: Cross-sectional StudiesIndian Journal of Dermatology, 61
Byung-Nam Yu, Saranya Raksong (2019)
RATIONAL DECISION MAKING AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM SMEs IN THAILAND, 11
(2005)
What differences make a difference?: the promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations
R. Sims, W. Sauser (2013)
Toward a Better Understanding of the Relationships among Received Wisdom, Groupthink, and Organizational Ethical CultureJournal of Management Policy and Practice, 14
Laurie Law, M. Khan (2018)
The Role of National Cultures in Shaping the Corporate Management Cultures: A Three-Country Theoretical Analysis
M. Turner, A. Pratkanis, Preston Probasco, C. Leve (1992)
Threat, Cohesion, and Group Effectiveness: Testing a Social Identity Maintenance Perspective on GroupthinkJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63
W. Boateng (2012)
Evaluating the Efficacy of Focus Group Discussion (FGD) in Qualitative Social Research
S. Riasudeen, Pankaj Singh, M. Kannadhasan (2019)
The Role of Job Satisfaction behind the Link between Group Cohesion, Collective Efficacy, and Life SatisfactionPsychological Studies
James Esser (1998)
Alive and Well after 25 Years: A Review of Groupthink Research.Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 73 2/3
J. Rose (2011)
Diverse Perspectives on the Groupthink Theory – A Literary Review
M. Tsikerdekis (2013)
The effects of perceived anonymity and anonymity States on conformity and groupthink in online communities: a wikipedia studyJournal of the American Society for Information Science
Travis Smith, Tom Nichols (2015)
Understanding the Millennial Generation
Artemis Chang, P. Bordia (2001)
A Multidimensional Approach to the Group Cohesion-Group Performance RelationshipSmall Group Research, 32
C. McCauley (1989)
The nature of social influence in groupthink: Compliance and internalization.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57
J. Russell, John Hawthorne, Lara Buchak (2014)
GroupthinkPhilosophical Studies, 172
Adeleke Banwo, Jianguo Du, U. Onokala (2015)
The Impact of Group Cohesiveness on Organizational Performance: The Nigerian CaseInternational Journal of Biometrics, 10
F. Riccobono, M. Bruccoleri, A. Größler (2016)
Groupthink and Project Performance: The Influence of Personal Traits and Interpersonal TiesProduction and Operations Management, 25
Gregory Moorhead, R. Ference, Christopher Neck (1991)
Group Decision Fiascoes Continue: Space Shuttle Challenger and a Revised Groupthink FrameworkHuman Relations, 44
J.L. Colesa, N.D. Danielb, L. Naveenc (2014)
Board groupthink
J. Ghattas, P. Soffer, M. Peleg (2014)
Improving business process decision making based on past experienceDecis. Support Syst., 59
R.A.M. Abazeed (2019)
Factors influencing decision quality: an empirical study on Managers in public institutions in JordanGlobal Journal of Management and Business Research: Administration and Management, 19
G. Vozikis, K. Weaver, E. Liguori (2013)
Do Family Cohesion and Family Member Skill Evaluation Affect Family Business Internal or External Hiring DecisionsJournal of Management Policy and Practice, 14
Ji Li, Kevin Lam, Gongming Qian (2001)
Does Culture Affect Behavior and Performance of Firms? The Case of Joint Ventures in ChinaJournal of International Business Studies, 32
L. Brawley, A. Carron (1987)
Assessing the Cohesion of Teams: Validity of the Group Environment QuestionnaireThe Journal of Sport Psychology, 9
Mk Rwegelera (2012)
The Effect of Globalization on Tanzanian Culture: A Review
C. O'Reilly, K. Williams, Sigal Barsade (1998)
Group demography and innovation: Does diversity help?
Won‐Woo Park (2000)
A comprehensive empirical investigation of the relationships among variables of the groupthink modelJournal of Organizational Behavior, 21
C. Pielstick (2000)
Formal vs. Informal Leading: A Comparative AnalysisJournal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 7
B. Mullen, T. Anthony, E. Salas, J. Driskell (1994)
Group Cohesiveness and Quality of Decision MakingSmall Group Research, 25
Peter Smith (2011)
Communication Styles as Dimensions of National CultureJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42
Michail Tsikerdekis (2013)
The effects of perceived anonymity and anonymity states on conformity and groupthink in online communities: A Wikipedia studyJ. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 64
K. Levin (2006)
Study design III: Cross-sectional studiesEvidence-Based Dentistry, 7
O. Negulescu, E. Doval (2014)
The Quality of Decision Making Process Related to Organizations’ Effectiveness☆Procedia. Economics and finance, 15
Groupthink happens in-group decision-making processes whereby members of a group prematurely arrive at a decision that may indicate consensus but for the aim of protecting group harmony. This limits the contributions of the individuals' talents, ideas, competences and experiences to more effective decisions. Although there are a number of studies on predictors (forecasters) of groupthink, they do not consider the influence of the African cultural aspects of collectivism, high power distance and tolerance on groupthink that may characterise the decision-making context in African settings. It is in that context that this case study analyses groupthink in a public sector organization in Tanzania.Design/methodology/approachThis paper unveils the presence of groupthink predictors that can affect the quality of decisions made in groups within the Tanzania context. The study was conducted in one of the public institutions in Tanzania that is under the Ministry of Home affairs. The study population included Directors, Managers, Heads of units, District registration officers and other officials as shown in Table 1. These are the people who participate in decision-making processes in the organization and were drawn from different offices of the organization including the headquarter office, Kibaha Data centre, District Registration offices from different regions including Dares Salaam, Coast region, Arusha, Mtwara, Mwanza, Manyara, Mbeya, Singida, Dodoma, Geita, Lindi and Njombe – these 12 administrative regions are among the 27 regions that make up the Tanzania mainland. Through simple random and purposive sampling methods, a total of 97 participants participated effectively. The criterion for participation being participants must have been involved with at least one decision-making group experience. The choice of the organization was done on the basis that it is a relatively a new institution of importance; it was also possible to get from it the needed data.FindingsThe results of the study show that there is the presence of groupthink predictors of high trust, conformity and promotional leadership in decision-making groups in the organization. Furthermore, the diversity of group members alone indicates to be insufficient reason to avoid Groupthink. It is suggested that other important factors might be at play in group decision making including the influence of African cultural characteristics.Research limitations/implicationsThis study was limited to only one institution. For a study of this nature to be undertaken access to data could be a very significant problem. Limiting it to one organization we are familiar with made it a bit easy to achieve access.Practical implicationsGroup decision making and groupthink are rarely in discourse in Africa. Tanzania is not isolated from the world, and being a country that unity is a cultural tenet that is promoted at every level from the family to national level (Rwegelera, 2003; Tripp, 1999) effects of groupthink is reasonably conspicuous because of the inbuilt national culture that has shaped people to be tolerant and accepting of different perspectives, ethnic groups, religious and races (Tripp, 1999). The same tolerance and acceptance may be transferred to decision-making groups and easily cause the occurrence of groupthink that can affect the quality of decisions made.Social implicationsThe Tanzania government has dedicated itself to putting strict measures to prohibit unethical and erroneous decisions that cost the nation including reducing employees' misconduct. The findings of this study indicate that there are hidden aspects like groupthink that are not reached by those measures yet ironically impacts the decisions made in organizations and in turn costs organizations and the country at large and calls for the government and its institutions together with the private sector to be awakened and alerted if they are dedicated and concerned about the quality of decisions they make.Originality/valueThis is an original research work building on previous research. Some findings on groupthink and implications have Western origins. In Africa, we need to figure out what is making the continent not to make significant steps to change the social-economic environment. This study highlights to both African academics and leaders with no management background to make them understand groupthink as a phenomena that has implications to quality decisions. It will also prompt similar studies and therefore widen understanding on decisions making.
International Journal of Public Leadership – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 25, 2022
Keywords: Groupthink; Decision making; Cohesiveness; Trust; Promotional leadership; Conformity; Collectivism and power distance
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.