Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Brebbia (1978)
The Boundary Element Method for Engineers
D. Lindholm (1980)
Notes on boundary integral equations for three-dimensional magnetostaticsIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 16
T. Nakata, N. Takahashi, K. Fujiwara, P. Olszewski, K. Muramatsu, T. Imai, Y. Shiraki
Numerical analysis and experiments of 3‐D nonlinear magnetostatic model
B. Krstajić, Z. Andelić, S. Milojković, S. Babić
Nonlinear 3D magnetostatic field calculation by the integral equation method with surface and volume magnetic charges
W. Hafla, A. Buchau, W. Rucker (2006)
Efficient computation of source magnetic scalar potentialAdvances in Radio Science, 4
J. McWhirter, J. Oravec, R. Haack (1982)
Computation of magnetostatic fields in three-dimensions based on Fredholm integral equationsIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 18
I. Mayergoyz, M. Chari, J. D'Angelo (1987)
A new scalar potential formulation for three-dimensional magnetostatic problemsIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 23
G. Bertotti
Hysteresis in Magnetism
D. Kim, I. Park, M. Park, H. Lee
3‐D magnetostatic field calculation by a single layer boundary integral equation method using a difference field concept
B. Krstajic, Z. Andelic, S. Milojkovic, S. Babic, S. Salon (1992)
Nonlinear 3D magnetostatic field calculation by the integral equation method with surface and volumeIEEE Transactions on Magnetics
W. Hafla, A. Buchau, F. Groh, W. Rucker (2005)
Efficient integral equation method for the solution of 3-D magnetostatic problemsIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 41
Dong-Hun Kim, Min-Cheol Park, I. Park, H. Lee (2000)
3-d magnetostatic field calculation by a single layer boundary integral equation method using a diffIEEE Transactions on Magnetics
S. Kurz, J. Fetzer, G. Lehner (1997)
A novel iterative algorithm for the nonlinear BEM-FEM coupling methodIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 33
Purpose – The paper seeks to solve nonlinear magnetostatic field problems with the integral equation method and different indirect formulations. Design/methodology/approach – To avoid large cancellation errors in cases where the demagnetizing field is high a difference field concept is used. This requires the computation of sources of the scalar potential of the excitation field. Findings – A new formulation to compute these sources is presented. The improved computational accuracy is demonstrated with numerical examples. Originality/value – The paper develops a novel formulation for the computation of sources of scalar excitation potential.
COMPEL: The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 1, 2006
Keywords: Magnetic fields; Numerical analysis
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.