Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
V.P. Kharbanda
Academia‐industry symbiosis: the new norm of science in socialist China
V. Krishna (2001)
Changing policy cultures, phases and trends in science and technology in IndiaScience and Public Policy, 28
Ishtiaq Mahmood, Jasjit Singh (2002)
Technological Dynamism in AsiaEconomic Growth
Ashok Jain, V. Kharbanda (2003)
Strengthening science and technology capacities for indigenisation of technology: the Indian experienceInt. J. Serv. Technol. Manag., 4
P. Li
Report on the outline of the Ninth Five Year Plan for National Economic Development and the long‐range objectives to the year 2010
S. Lall (1998)
Technology and Human Capital in Maturing Asian CountriesScience Technology & Society, 3
J. Ziman (1996)
Is science losing its objectivity?Nature, 382
J. Feng
863 Program spurs science and technology
R. Safadi, Sam Laird (1996)
The Uruguay Round agreements: Impact on developing countriesWorld Development, 24
MOST
Science and Technology Policy‐2003
B. Bowonder, S. Mani (2004)
Venture capital and innovation: the Indian experience
V. Kharbanda, M. Qureshi (1987)
Science, technology, and economic development in China
DST
Annual Report 1997‐98
MOST
China Science and Technology Indicators 2001
Ministry of Science and Technology of PRC
China S&T Statistics – Data Book
V.P. Kharbanda
Facilitating innovation in Indian small and medium enterprises – the role of clusters
V. Kharbanda (2002)
Learning Organisations: The Process of Innovation and Technological ChangeAI & SOCIETY, 16
Nagesh Kumar, K. Joseph (2006)
National Innovation Systems and India’s IT Capability: Are There Any Lessons for ASEAN Newcomers?
DST
A draft paper for a New Technology Policy
Shulin Gu (2001)
Science and Technology Policy for Development: China's Experience in the Second Half of the Twentieth CenturyScience Technology & Society, 6
S. Mani (2002)
Government, Innovation and Technology Policy: An International Comparative Analysis
George Gilboy (2004)
The Myth Behind China's MiracleForeign Affairs, 83
E. Baark (2001)
TECHNOLOGY AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN CHINA: Commercialization Reforms in the Science and Technology SectorReview of Policy Research, 18
Blanka Vavakova (1998)
The New Social Contract Between Governments, Universities and Society: Has the Old One Failed?Minerva, 36
DST
Annual Report 2009‐10
Financial Express
Advantage R&D – India's becoming a research hub for MNCs
V. Kharbanda (1996)
Reforming Science and Technology System in China, 1985-95Science Technology & Society, 1
M. Zedtwitz (2004)
Managing Foreign R&D Laboratories in ChinaR & D Management, 34
V.P. Kharbanda
Scientific Communities in India and China – Formation, Growth and Changing Structure
Masako Ueda (2012)
Venture Capital and Innovation
S. Gu
China's Industrial Technology: Market Reform and Organizational Change
En-Lai Chou (1975)
Report on the Work of the GovernmentChina Report, 11
DSIR
Program Aimed at Technological Self Reliance (PATSER): Guidelines for Support
DST
Research and Development Statistics – 2007‐08
Z. Jiang
National conference stresses technological renovation
MOST
R&D Statistics
CSIR
CSIR 2001 – Vision and Strategy
S. Macdonald, Yun-feng Deng (2004)
Science parks in China: a cautionary explorationInternational Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 1
A. Young, Robert Wilson, D. Bosworth (1993)
Research and Development Statistics
D. Yim, Pradosh Nath (2005)
National Innovation Systems in the Asian ContextScience, Technology & Society, 10
E. Baark (1994)
Technological Entrepreneurship and Commercialization of Research Results in the West and in China: Comparative PerspectivesTechnology Analysis & Strategic Management, 6
M. Gibbons, C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, M. Trow
The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies
V.P. Kharbanda
Industrial clusters and academia‐industry linkages: some impressions from Italy, Germany and UK
DST
Annual Report 2000‐01
IIC
Statement on Industrial Policy 1991
V. Kharbanda (2000)
Academia—Industry Symbiosis: Need for Technological Competitiveness in India and ChinaChina Report, 36
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to review and compare the changing science and technology policy orientation during the 1990s for both China and India in the process of globalization. In this concern, it seeks to understand the changed orientations of the scientists from the purely academic mode to academic‐entrepreneurial hybrid mode to build up strong national innovations systems in both the countries and present the detailed findings of a sample survey of bio‐scientists in China and India. Design/methodology/approach – The paper makes an analytical review of changing science and technology policies in India and China in the global context by taking into consideration the government documents, reports and research papers, and presents the findings of the sample survey carried by the author, through interviews and questionnaire study of bio‐scientists in India and China. Findings – The developments clearly indicate the changing structural and institutional context of scientific research in an entrepreneurial mode to build up strong national innovation systems (NIS) in both the countries. This is supported by the findings of the survey on the orientations of bio‐scientists in China and India with reference to the changed situation since 1990. It shows that majority of the scientists are of the opinion that equal importance should be given to exploration of knowledge as well as commercialization. In this new environment, scientist academician is slowly being metamorphosed into scientist entrepreneur but with a dual task to strengthen the NIS. The concept of scientist entrepreneur, in the present environment, is well placed in both the countries, although still under experimentation. Originality/value – In the present context of globalization and growing international competition, the introduction of market cultures in the Chinese and the Indian economies is fast changing the orientation of the scientific communities in both the countries to perform the dual task of knowledge generation as well as commercialization in order to meet national socio‐economic objectives. This has not been studied before. The present paper tries to understand the ongoing metamorphosis of the academician to entrepreneur for long‐term sustainability of the NIS in India and China.
Journal of Science and Technology Policy in China – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 1, 2011
Keywords: China; India; Globalization; Knowledge creation; Entrepreneurs; Innovation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.