Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Veldhuis (2005)
Propeller Wing Aerodynamic Interference
K. Biber (2011)
Estimating Propeller Slipstream Drag on Airplane PerformanceJournal of Aircraft, 48
R. Stone (2008)
Aerodynamic Modeling of the Wing-Propeller Interaction for a Tail-Sitter Unmanned Air VehicleJournal of Aircraft, 45
G. Ferraro, T. Kipouros, A. Savill, A. Rampurawala, C. Agostinelli (2014)
Propeller-Wing Interaction Prediction for Early Design
R. Stone (2002)
Aerodynamic Modelling of a Wing-in-Slipstream Tail-Sitter UAV
W. Phillips, D. Snyder (2000)
Modern Adaptation of Prandtl's Classic Lifting-Line TheoryJournal of Aircraft, 37
R. Kuhn (1959)
Semiempirical Procedure for Estimating Lift and Drag Characteristics of Propeller-Wing-Flap Configurations for Vertical-and Short-Take-Off-and-Landing Airplanes
R. Marretta (1997)
Different Wings Flowfields Interaction on the Wing-Propeller CouplingJournal of Aircraft, 34
D. Witkowski, Alexander Lee, J. Sullivan (1988)
Aerodynamic interaction between propellers and wingsJournal of Aircraft, 26
Aeromechanical Solutions L.L.C. (2014)
Drag model for airplanes with propellers
J. Chiaramonte, D. Favier, C. Maresca, S. Benneceur (1996)
Aerodynamic interaction study of the propeller/wing under different flow configurationsJournal of Aircraft, 33
PurposeThe traditional numerical methods to predict the interaction between the wing and propeller are too complex and time-consuming for computation to a certain extent. Therefore, they are not applicable for a real-time integrated turboprop aircraft model. This paper aims to present a simplified model capable of high-precision and real-time computing.Design/methodology/approachA wing model based on the lifting line theory coupled with a propeller model based on the strip theory is used to predict the propeller-wing interaction. To meet the requirement of real-time computing, a novel decoupling parameter is presented to replace lifting line model (LLM) applied for wings with a simplified fitting model (FM).FindingsThe comparison between the LLM and the simplified FM demonstrates that the results of the FM have a good agreement with the results of the LLM, which means that the simplified FM has the advantages of both high-accuracy and real-time computation.Practical implicationsAfter simplification, the propeller-wing interaction model is suitable for a real-time integrated turboprop aircraft model.Originality/valueA novel decoupling parameter is presented to replace LLM applied for wings with a simplified FM, which has the advantages of both high-accuracy and real-time computation.
Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology: An International Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 2, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.