Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Vacuumschmelze GmbH & Co. KG in Hanau
Rare‐Earth Permanent Magnets, Vacodym · Vacomax, Product Brochure
R. Ghanem, P. Spanos
Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach
I. Coenen, M. Gracia, K. Hameyer (2011)
Influence and evaluation of non‐ideal manufacturing process on the cogging torque of a permanent magnet excited synchronous machineCompel-the International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 30
F. Jurisch
Production process based deviations in the orientation of anisotropic permanent magnets and their effects onto the operation performance of electrical machines and magnetic sensors – German
S. Clénet, Nathan Ida, R. Gaignaire, O. Moreau (2010)
Solution of Dual Stochastic Static Formulations Using Double Orthogonal PolynomialsIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 46
B. Sudret
Uncertainty propagation and sensitivity analysis in mechanical models – contributions to structural reliability and stochastic spectral methods
R. Ramarotafika, A. Benabou, S. Clénet (2012)
Stochastic Modeling of Soft Magnetic Properties of Electrical Steels: Application to Stators of Electrical MachinesIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 48
B. Sudret (2008)
Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansionsReliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 93
Purpose – Due to the production process, arc segment magnets with radial magnetization for surface‐mounted permanent‐magnet synchronous machines (PMSM) can exhibit a deviation from the intended ideal, radial directed magnetization. In such cases, the resulting air gap field may show spatial variations in angle and absolute value of the flux‐density. For this purpose, this paper aims to create and evaluate a stochastic magnet model. Design/methodology/approach – In this paper, a polynomial chaos meta‐model approach, extracted from a finite element model, is compared to a direct sampling approach. Both approaches are evaluated using Monte‐Carlo simulation for the calculation of the flux‐density above one sole magnet surface. Findings – The used approach allows representing the flux‐density's variations in terms of the magnet's stochastic input variations, which is not possible with pure Monte‐Carlo simulation. Furthermore, the resulting polynomial‐chaos meta‐model can be used to accelerate the calculation of error probabilities for a given limit state function by a factor of ten. Research limitations/implications – Due to epistemic uncertainty magnet variations are assumed to be purely Gaussian distributed. Originality/value – The comparison of both approaches verifies the assumption that the polynomial chaos meta‐model of the magnets will be applicable for a complete machine simulation.
COMPEL: The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 5, 2013
Keywords: Finite element method; Monte Carlo simulation; Manufacturing tolerances; Magnet variations; Stochastics; Magnetic flux‐density deviations; Monte Carlo methods; Manufacturing systems; Magnetism
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.