Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Hofstede (1983)
National Cultures in Four Dimensions: A Research-Based Theory of Cultural Differences among NationsInternational Studies of Management and Organization, 13
Staw B. M. (1981)
10.5465/amr.1981.4285694Academy of Management Review, 6
K. Watabe, C. Holsapple, Andrew Whinston (1992)
Coordinator support in a nemawashi decision processDecis. Support Syst., 8
J. March (1962)
The Business Firm as a Political CoalitionThe Journal of Politics, 24
R. Marsh (1992)
A Research Note: Centralization of Decision-making in Japanese FactoriesOrganization Studies, 13
Mayumi Otsubo (1986)
A Guide to Japanese Business PracticesCalifornia Management Review, 28
S. Milgram (1963)
BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF OBEDIENCE.Journal of abnormal psychology, 67
Krauss E. S. (1984)
10.1515/9780824844165
Michael Cohen, J. March, Johan Olsen (1972)
A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.Administrative Science Quarterly, 17
Kiyotaka Yamada (1991)
Creativity in JapanLeadership & Organization Development Journal, 12
H. Mano (1994)
Risk-Taking, Framing Effects, and AffectOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57
A. Goldman (1994)
The centrality of “ningensei” to Japanese negotiating and interpersonal relationships: Implications for U.S.-Japanese communication☆International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18
D. Kahneman, A. Tversky (1979)
PROSPECT THEORY: AN ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISKEconometrica, 47
Matsuda Noriyuki (1985)
Strong, Quasi-, and Weak Conformity among Japanese in the Modified Asch ProcedureJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16
Karel Cool, C. Lengnick-Hall (1985)
Second Thoughts on the Transferability of the Japanese Management StyleOrganization Studies, 6
The Escalation of Commitment
This paper examines and challenges the embodiment of Japanese decision making in the term ringi. A model for attaining decision consensus is developed from existing literature and validated through interviews with Japanese managers. The model incorporates interpersonal process mechanisms into a series of decision stages, from which consensus evolves. The model shows the decision process to be iterative, reverting to previous stages, until issues blocking consensus are resolved. From the behavior patterns identified in the Japanese decision process model, propositions are offered on the implications of western decision theories in Japanese organizations. The adoption of Japanese decision making into western organizations may be limited to the newer teambased organizations.
The International Journal of Organizational Analysis – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 1995
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.