Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Lawson, R. Hanson (1976)
Solving least squares problems, 15
M. Hansen, Lee Perry, C. Reese (2004)
A Bayesian operationalization of the resource‐based viewSouthern Medical Journal, 25
R. Amit, P. Schoemaker (1993)
Strategic assets and organizational rentSouthern Medical Journal, 14
A. Dempster, N. Laird, D. Rubin (1977)
Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper
D. Titterington, A. Smith, U. Makov (1986)
Statistical analysis of finite mixture distributions
B. Johns, W. Hogan (1961)
A THEORY OF THE GROWTH OF THE FIRMEconomic Record, 37
Per Capita, E. Dawson, Myfan Jordan (1995)
About the authorsMachine Vision and Applications, 1
D. Teece, G. Pisano, A. Shuen (1997)
DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENTStrategic Management Journal, 18
Bernard Jaworski, Ajay Kohli (1993)
Market Orientation: Antecedents and ConsequencesJournal of Marketing, 57
R. Boyles (1983)
On the Convergence of the EM AlgorithmJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 45
Eitan Gerstner, J. Hess, John Roberts (2007)
Uncertain Imitability : An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition
H. Bozdogan, S. Sclove (1984)
Multi-sample cluster analysis using Akaike's Information CriterionAnnals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 36
Joseph Mahoney, J. Pandian (1992)
The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic managementSouthern Medical Journal, 13
Here, we utilize a modification of the Lawson and Hansen
E. Zajac, Matthew Kraatz, Rudi Bresser (2000)
Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: a normative approach to strategic changeStrategic Management Journal, 21
Richard Priem, J. Butler (2001)
Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research?Academy of Management Review, 26
J. Conant, M. Mokwa, P. Varadarajan (1990)
Strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance: A multiple measures‐based studySouthern Medical Journal, 11
Ingemar Dierickx, Karel Cool (1989)
Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantageManagement Science, 35
J. Barney (2001)
IS THE RESOURCE-BASED " VIEW " A USEFUL PERSPECTIVE FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH ?
G. Day, R. Wensley (1988)
Assessing Advantage: A Framework for Diagnosing Competitive SuperiorityJournal of Marketing, 52
M. Zollo, S. Winter (2002)
Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic CapabilitiesOrganization Science, 13
W. Robinson, C. Fornell, Mary Sullivan (1992)
Are market pioneers intrinsically stronger than later entrantsSouthern Medical Journal, 13
Mary Tripsas (1997)
Unraveling The Process Of Creative Destruction: Complementary Assets And Incumbent Survival In The Typesetter IndustryStrategic Management Journal, 18
S. Yakowitz (1970)
Unsupervised learning and the identification of finite mixturesIEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 16
W. DeSarbo, E. Edwards (1996)
Typologies of Compulsive Buying Behavior: A Constrained Clusterwise Regression Approach
Author Wu, F. BYC., WU Jeff (1983)
ON THE CONVERGENCE PROPERTIES OF THE EM ALGORITHMAnnals of Statistics, 11
A. Bharadwaj, Sundar Bharadwaj, B. Konsynski (1999)
Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin's qManagement Science, 45
G. Schwarz (1978)
Estimating the Dimension of a ModelAnnals of Statistics, 6
W. DeSarbo, A. Benedetto, K. Jedidi, Michael Song (2006)
A Constrained Latent Structure Multivariate Regression Methodology for Empirically Deriving Strategic Types
Michael Song, C. Benedetto, R. Nason (2007)
Capabilities and financial performance: the moderating effect of strategic typeJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35
Richard Makadok (1999)
Interfirm differences in scale economies and the evolution of market sharesStrategic Management Journal, 20
G. Tallis, P. Chesson (1982)
Identifiability of mixturesJournal of the Australian Mathematical Society. Series A. Pure Mathematics and Statistics, 32
W.S. DeSarbo, W. Cron
A conditional mixture maximum likelihood methodology for clusterwise linear regression
C. Zott (2003)
DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND THE EMERGENCE OF INTRAINDUSTRY DIFFERENTIAL FIRM PERFORMANCE: INSIGHTS FROM A SIMULATION STUDYStrategic Management Journal, 24
Constance Helfat, Margaret Peteraf (2003)
The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecyclesStrategic Management Journal, 24
D. Dillman (1979)
Mail and telephone surveys : the total design methodSocial Forces, 11
Anil Nair, Joseph Trendowski, William Judge (2008)
The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, by Edith T. Penrose. Oxford: Blackwell, 1959 (Book Review), 33
(1995)
Marketing Strategy - Planning and Implementation
M. Hitt, R. Ireland (1986)
RELATIONSHIPS AMONG CORPORATE LEVEL DISTINCTIVE COMPETENCIES, DIVERSIFICATION STRATEGY, CORPORATE STRUCTURE AND PERFORMANCEJournal of Management Studies, 23
S. Shortell, E. Zajac (1990)
Perceptual and archival measures of Miles and Snow's strategic types: a comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity.Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management, 33 4
R. Rumelt (1984)
Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm
D. Hosmer (1973)
A Comparison of Iterative Maximum Likelihood Estimates of the Parameters of a Mixture of Two Normal Distributions Under Three Different Types of SampleBiometrics, 29
(1997)
The Squandered Computer
B. Dyer, X. Song (1997)
The Impact of Strategy on Conflict: A Cross- National Comparative Study of U.S. and Japanese firmsJournal of International Business Studies, 28
D. Bergh (1998)
Product-Market Uncertainty, Portfolio Restructuring, and Performance: An Information-processing and Resource-Based ViewJournal of Management, 24
A.P. Dempster, N.M. Laird, D.B. Rubin
Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm
Richard Makadok (2001)
Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creationSouthern Medical Journal, 22
G. Day (1994)
The Capabilities of Market-Driven OrganizationsJournal of Marketing, 58
David Miller (2003)
An asymmetry‐based view of advantage: towards an attainable sustainabilityStrategic Management Journal, 24
B. Wernerfelt (1984)
A Resource-Based View of the FirmSouthern Medical Journal, 5
A.A. Alchian, H. Demsetz
Production, information costs and economic organization
David David (1974)
Maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters of a mixture of two regression linesCommunications in Statistics-theory and Methods, 3
W. DeSarbo, W. Cron (1988)
A maximum likelihood methodology for clusterwise linear regressionJournal of Classification, 5
W. DeSarbo, A. Benedetto, K. Jedidi, Michael Song (2006)
Identifying Sources of Heterogeneity for Empirically Deriving Strategic Types: A Constrained Finite-Mixture Structural-Equation Methodology
D. Hambrick (1983)
Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow's strategic types.Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management, 26 1
C.E. Helfat, M.A. Peteraf
The dynamic resource based view
David Deephouse (1999)
Media Reputation as a Strategic Resource: An Integration of Mass Communication and Resource-Based TheoriesJournal of Management, 26
D. Hambrick (2003)
On the staying power of defenders, analyzers, and prospectorsAcademy of Management Executive, 17
Robert Ruekert, O. Walker (1987)
Interactions between marketing and R&D departments in implementing different business strategiesSouthern Medical Journal, 8
H. Teicher
Identifiability of finite mixtures
R. Miles, C. Snow, A. Meyer, H. Coleman (1978)
Organizational strategy, structure, and process.Academy of management review. Academy of Management, 3 3
S. Yakowitz, J. Spragins (1968)
On the Identifiability of Finite MixturesAnnals of Mathematical Statistics, 39
R. Miles, C. Snow (1994)
Fit, failure, and the hall of fame : how companies succeed or fail
(1973)
Pattern Recognition and Scene
Daniel Rajaratnam, L. Chonko (1995)
The Effect of Business Strategy Type on Marketing Organization Design, Product-Market Growth Strategy, Relative Marketing Effort, and Organization PerformanceThe Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 3
(2005)
Modeling a contingency framework of strategic choice involving strategic types, firm capabilities, and environmental uncertainty
David Hoopes, Tammy Madsen, Gordon Walker, E. Cox (2003)
’ INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL ISSUE : WHY IS THERE A RESOURCE-BASED VIEW ? TOWARD A THEORY OF COMPETITIVE HETEROGENEITY
D. McKee, P. Varadarajan, W. Pride (1989)
Strategic Adaptability and Firm Performance: A Market-Contingent PerspectiveJournal of Marketing, 53
D. Hambrick (1984)
Taxonomic Approaches to Studying Strategy: Some Conceptual and Methodological IssuesJournal of Management, 10
Margaret Peteraf (1993)
The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based viewSouthern Medical Journal, 14
Margaret Peteraf, M. Bergen (2003)
Scanning Dynamic Competitive Landscapes: A Market-based and Resource-based FrameworkSouthern Medical Journal, 24
S. Hunt, R. Morgan (1995)
The Comparative Advantage Theory of CompetitionJournal of Marketing, 59
John Narver, S. Slater (1990)
The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business ProfitabilityJournal of Marketing, 54
J. Barney (1986)
Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business StrategyManagement Science, 32
E. Brynjolfsson, L. Hitt (1998)
Beyond the productivity paradoxCommun. ACM, 41
G. Day (1990)
Market Driven Strategy: Processes for Creating Value
H. Akaike (1974)
A new look at the statistical model identificationIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19
D.G. Hoopes, T.L. Madsen, G. Walker
Guest editors' introduction to the special issue: why is there a resource‐based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity
J. Barney (1991)
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive AdvantageJournal of Management, 17
R.O. Duda, P.E. Hart
Pattern Recognition and Scene Analysis
H. Bozdogan (1987)
Model selection and Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensionsPsychometrika, 52
E. Zajac, S. Shortell (1989)
Changing generic strategies: Likelihood, direction, and performance implicationsStrategic Management Journal, 10
C. Hennig (2000)
Identifiablity of Models for Clusterwise Linear RegressionJournal of Classification, 17
A. Koehler, E. Murphree (1988)
A Comparison of the Akaike and Schwarz Criteria for Selecting Model OrderApplied statistics, 37
E. Swanson (1994)
Information systems innovation among organizationsManagement Science, 40
Stephen Mcdaniel, J. Kolari (1987)
Marketing Strategy Implications of the Miles and Snow Strategic TypologyJournal of Marketing, 51
M. Malone (1993)
The Virtual Corporation
S. Lippman, R. Rumelt (2003)
A BARGAINING PERSPECTIVE ON RESOURCE ADVANTAGESouthern Medical Journal, 24
W. DeSarbo, A. Benedetto, Michael Song, Indrajit Sinha (2005)
Revisiting the Miles and Snow Strategic Framework: Uncovering Interrelationships between Strategic Types, Capabilities, Environmental Uncertainty, and Firm PerformanceSRPN: Sustainable Development (Topic)
G. Hult, D. Ketchen (2001)
Does market orientation matter?: a test of the relationship between positional advantage and performanceSouthern Medical Journal, 22
R. Moenaert, W. Souder (1996)
Context and Antecedents of Information Utility at the R&D/Marketing InterfaceManagement Science, 42
(1912)
Benedetto is Professor of Marketing at the Fox School of Business Administration of Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122
Purpose – The resource‐based view (RBV) of the firm has gained much attention in recent years as a means to understand how a strategic business unit obtains a sustainable competitive advantage. In this framework, several research studies have explored the relationships between resources/capabilities and firm performance. This paper seeks to extend this line of research by explicitly modeling the heterogeneity of such relations across firms in various different industries in exploring the interrelationships between capabilities and performance. Design/methodology/approach – A unique latent structure regression model is developed to provide a discrete representation of this heterogeneity in terms of different clusters or groups of firms who employ different paths to achieve firm performance vis‐à‐vis alternative capabilities. An application of the proposed methodology to a sample of 216 US firms were provided. Findings – Finds that the derived four group latent structure regression solution statistically dominates the one aggregate sample regression function. Substantive interpretation for the findings is provided. Originality/value – The paper contributes to the understanding of the performance effects of investing in capabilities in the RBV framework, which has previously been lacking, especially in the areas of information technology capabilities.
Journal of Modelling in Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 10, 2007
Keywords: Resource management; Modelling; Competitive advantage; Company performance
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.