Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A critical analysis of organizational transformation – PSR

A critical analysis of organizational transformation – PSR Hunter Harrison, CEO of the railroad company CSX, died on December 16, 2017. Harrison, known as the railroad transformation guru, was a controversial person. While his transformations were applauded by investors, they were also subject to significant criticism. The author changes triggered service disruptions, customer complaints and federal scrutiny. The purpose of this paper is to conduct an in-depth analysis of the transformation at CSX and to develop a framework for the analysis of organizational transformation projects.Design/methodology/approachThe authors critically analyze the transformation at CSX – known as precision scheduled railroading (PSR). The authors base the initial analysis on the Lean approach to organizational change the authors compare and contrast the two approaches and the authors highlight both positive and negative aspects. The empirical data was collected via two rounds of interviews with employees at CSX – the first informal, the second structured. The lack of academic articles dealing with PSR, the authors focused on the review on trade and newspaper articles.FindingsFirst, while many transformations are conducted under the assumption that they will improve both effectiveness and efficiency, they are in reality often mainly efficiency improvement programs that can, in fact, hurt both effectiveness and employee morale. Second, the paper presents a framework for the analysis of transformation projects.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors identify factors for analysis of transformation programs and the authors develop a framework, which structures significant change aspects into three categories, namely, purpose, process and people.Practical implicationsOrganizations can use the framework to understand the requirements for successful transformation, to analyze if the chosen method matches the organizational strategy and to facilitate successful implementation in the companies.Originality/valueThis is the first research paper on PSR and the first paper contrasting PSR with other transformation methods. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences Emerald Publishing

A critical analysis of organizational transformation – PSR

Download PDF
14 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/a-critical-analysis-of-organizational-transformation-psr-jV1Yfxlz60
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1756-669X
DOI
10.1108/ijqss-11-2018-0092
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Hunter Harrison, CEO of the railroad company CSX, died on December 16, 2017. Harrison, known as the railroad transformation guru, was a controversial person. While his transformations were applauded by investors, they were also subject to significant criticism. The author changes triggered service disruptions, customer complaints and federal scrutiny. The purpose of this paper is to conduct an in-depth analysis of the transformation at CSX and to develop a framework for the analysis of organizational transformation projects.Design/methodology/approachThe authors critically analyze the transformation at CSX – known as precision scheduled railroading (PSR). The authors base the initial analysis on the Lean approach to organizational change the authors compare and contrast the two approaches and the authors highlight both positive and negative aspects. The empirical data was collected via two rounds of interviews with employees at CSX – the first informal, the second structured. The lack of academic articles dealing with PSR, the authors focused on the review on trade and newspaper articles.FindingsFirst, while many transformations are conducted under the assumption that they will improve both effectiveness and efficiency, they are in reality often mainly efficiency improvement programs that can, in fact, hurt both effectiveness and employee morale. Second, the paper presents a framework for the analysis of transformation projects.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors identify factors for analysis of transformation programs and the authors develop a framework, which structures significant change aspects into three categories, namely, purpose, process and people.Practical implicationsOrganizations can use the framework to understand the requirements for successful transformation, to analyze if the chosen method matches the organizational strategy and to facilitate successful implementation in the companies.Originality/valueThis is the first research paper on PSR and the first paper contrasting PSR with other transformation methods.

Journal

International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jun 12, 2020

Keywords: Process improvement; Lean; Critical success factors; Transformational leadership; Organizational change

References

  • Critical success factors for lean implementation within SMEs
    Achanga, P.; Shehab, E.; Roy, R.; Nelder, G.
  • Narcissistic business leaders as heralds of the self-proclaimed excellence
    Anninos, L.
  • How to anticipate a burning platform
    Anthony, S.
  • Hunter Harrison and the transformation of Canadian national railway – a case study of the five Ps of cultural change
    Beatty, C.A.
  • Struggling with solutions; a case study of using organization concepts
    Benders, J.; Slomp, J.
  • CSX top exec provides STB with an update on PSR implementation
    Berman, J.
  • Prominent obstacles to lean
    Bhasin, S.
  • Successful lean implementation: organisational culture and soft lean practices
    Bortolotti, T.; Boscari, S.; Dainese, P.
  • Introduction to precision railroading, part 3: where do we go from here?
    Bowers, B.
  • New developments in re-engineering organizations
    Campbell, S.; Kleiner, B.H.
  • Relationship among organizational support, JIT implementation, and performance
    Chong, H.; White, R.; Prybutok, V.
  • The agile supply chain: competing in volatile markets
    Christopher, M.
  • The effect of just-in-time with customers on organizational design and performance
    Claycomb, C.; Droge, C.; Germain, R.
  • Lean production, six sigma quality
    Dahlgaard, J.J.; Dahlgaard-Park, S.M.
  • The challenge of managing organizational change: exploring the relationships of re-engineering, developing learning organizations and total quality management
    Dervitsiotis, K.
  • Business modeling based on logistics to support business process Re-Engineering
    Gerrits, H.; Glasson; , B.C.
  • It was such a handy term: management fashions and pragmatic ambiguity
    Giroux, H.
  • Lean services: a systematic review
    Gupta, S.; Sharma, M.; Sunder, V.
  • Learning to evolve: a review of the evolution of contemporary lean thinking
    Hines, P.; Holweg, M.; Rich, N.
  • Genba kanri: a commonsense
    Imai, M.
  • Lean production: literature review and trends
    Jasti, N.V.K.; Kodali, R.
  • The rhetoric and reality of lean: a multiple case study
    Langstrand, J.; Drotz, E.
  • CSX chief hunter Harrison has died, wall street journal, Dec 16
    McNish, J.
  • Executive director of the Shingo prize
    Miller, R.
  • Spotting a management fad
    Miller, D.; Hartwick, J.
  • Measuring the success of lean
    Minter, S.
  • Critical factors and performance measures of TQM
    Motwani, J.
  • Lean and six sigma – critical success factors revisited
    Naslund, D.
  • Critical success factors for implementing lean production: the effect of contingencies
    Netland, T.H.
  • Criteria for a lean organization: development of a lean assessment tool
    Pakdil, F.; Leonard, K.M.
  • Logistics case study based research: towards higher quality
    Pedrosa, A.; Näslund, D.; Jasmand, C.
  • The evolution of lean six sigma
    Pepper, M.P.J.; Spedding, T.A.
  • Knowledge management: another management fad?
    Ponzi, L.J.; Koenig, M.
  • Sampling in Interview-Based qualitative research: a theoretical and practical guide
    Robinson, O.
  • Lean manufacturing, non-financial performance measures, and financial performance
    Rosemary, R.F.; Wempe, W.F.
  • Managing the white space
    Rummler, G.; Branche, A.
  • Lean, take two! reflections from the second attempt at lean implementation
    Scherrer-Rathje, M.; Boyle, T.A.; Deflorin, P.
  • Defining and developing measures of lean production
    Shah, R.; Ward, P.
  • Storytelling: a co-creative process to support value-based leadership
    Snyder, K.; Hedlund, C.; Ingelsson, P.; Bäckström, I.
  • CSX tries to unclog its network while implementing a new operating model
    Stagl, J.
  • CSX disruptions weren’t as ‘overplayed’ as advertised
    Sutherland, B.
  • Enhancing the practical relevance of research
    Toffel, M.W.
  • CSX CEO Hunter Harrison has died
  • Can a 72-Year-Old railroad legend do it again with CSX?
    Tully, S.
  • Investors are wagering $12 billion on this 72-Year-Old railroad savior
    Tully, S.
  • Why hunter Harrison's railroad revolution will outlive him at CSX
    Tully, S.
  • From lean production to the lean enterprise
    Womack, J.; Jones, D.
  • Reductionism and complex thinking during ERP implementations
    Wood, T.; Caldas, M.P.
  • Lean, six sigma and lean sigma: fads or real process improvement methods?
    Näslund, D.