Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Legal Challenges of Criminal and Civil Asset Forfeiture in South Africa: A Comparative Analysis

The Legal Challenges of Criminal and Civil Asset Forfeiture in South Africa: A Comparative Analysis VINESH BASDEO I. INTRODUCTION Asset forfeiture has emerged as the new `big idea' for controlling criminal behaviour in the twenty-first century. The benefits of asset forfeiture are indisputable. The power of law enforcement to combat organised criminal activity is greatly increased. This is of particular importance in South Africa, a country deeply troubled by organised crime. As one scholar observed: `South Africa's rising crime rate makes it one of the most disturbing and dangerous countries in the world.'1 This article provides a legal description of asset forfeiture and focuses on contemporary substantive legal provisions. It describes, compares and analyses South African domestic legal provisions with those from the United States of America. While these comparisons are intended to provide a more comprehensive analysis and effective understanding of asset forfeiture, they make the research more challenging because of differences in legal systems. Asset forfeiture law is an integral part of criminal law enforcement in South Africa. This article attempts to answer three questions. First, why is asset forfeiture important to law enforcement? Second, what types of property are subject to forfeiture and in what circumstances? Third, how is forfeiture accomplished? The deprivation of the proceeds of crime has been http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png African Journal of International and Comparative Law Edinburgh University Press

The Legal Challenges of Criminal and Civil Asset Forfeiture in South Africa: A Comparative Analysis

Download PDF
24 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/edinburgh-university-press/the-legal-challenges-of-criminal-and-civil-asset-forfeiture-in-south-1iYfK8koeW
Publisher
Edinburgh University Press
Copyright
© Edinburgh University Press 2013
Subject
Articles; African Studies
ISSN
0954-8890
eISSN
1755-1609
DOI
10.3366/ajicl.2013.0066
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

VINESH BASDEO I. INTRODUCTION Asset forfeiture has emerged as the new `big idea' for controlling criminal behaviour in the twenty-first century. The benefits of asset forfeiture are indisputable. The power of law enforcement to combat organised criminal activity is greatly increased. This is of particular importance in South Africa, a country deeply troubled by organised crime. As one scholar observed: `South Africa's rising crime rate makes it one of the most disturbing and dangerous countries in the world.'1 This article provides a legal description of asset forfeiture and focuses on contemporary substantive legal provisions. It describes, compares and analyses South African domestic legal provisions with those from the United States of America. While these comparisons are intended to provide a more comprehensive analysis and effective understanding of asset forfeiture, they make the research more challenging because of differences in legal systems. Asset forfeiture law is an integral part of criminal law enforcement in South Africa. This article attempts to answer three questions. First, why is asset forfeiture important to law enforcement? Second, what types of property are subject to forfeiture and in what circumstances? Third, how is forfeiture accomplished? The deprivation of the proceeds of crime has been

Journal

African Journal of International and Comparative Law – Edinburgh University Press

Published: Oct 1, 2013

There are no references for this article.