Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Skirting the Justice System through Presidential Clemency in Zambia: Some Critical Reflections

Skirting the Justice System through Presidential Clemency in Zambia: Some Critical Reflections Presidential or executive power of pardoning convicted offenders is, generally speaking, beyond ordinary checks and balances. It could arguably be one of the most controversial of executive powers prone to abuse by the political elite. To the extent that the power sanctions the circumvention of the justice system by undoing, sidestepping, and interfering with some judicial outcomes, its appropriateness has been questioned as being possibly a serious indictment on the separation of powers and the rule of law. This contribution focuses on the use of the presidential power of clemency in Zambia as a reflective case study. It addresses some of the legitimate questions that arise from a legal and constitutional standpoint in the use of this power. The paper argues that the danger that is posed to the independence of the judiciary by the power of pardon does not derive from the mere existence of the prerogative of mercy powers, but rather from collateral factors such as the apparent failure to understand the extent to which pardoned convicts lose their rights, rather than gain them; the apparent failure to appreciate the justice protective function of the power of pardon itself; and the absence of inbuilt trigger mechanisms in the law to monitor possible abuse of the power. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png African Journal of International and Comparative Law Edinburgh University Press

Skirting the Justice System through Presidential Clemency in Zambia: Some Critical Reflections

Loading next page...
 
/lp/edinburgh-university-press/skirting-the-justice-system-through-presidential-clemency-in-zambia-fZtxus3InA

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Edinburgh University Press
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh University Press
ISSN
0954-8890
eISSN
1755-1609
DOI
10.3366/ajicl.2022.0416
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Presidential or executive power of pardoning convicted offenders is, generally speaking, beyond ordinary checks and balances. It could arguably be one of the most controversial of executive powers prone to abuse by the political elite. To the extent that the power sanctions the circumvention of the justice system by undoing, sidestepping, and interfering with some judicial outcomes, its appropriateness has been questioned as being possibly a serious indictment on the separation of powers and the rule of law. This contribution focuses on the use of the presidential power of clemency in Zambia as a reflective case study. It addresses some of the legitimate questions that arise from a legal and constitutional standpoint in the use of this power. The paper argues that the danger that is posed to the independence of the judiciary by the power of pardon does not derive from the mere existence of the prerogative of mercy powers, but rather from collateral factors such as the apparent failure to understand the extent to which pardoned convicts lose their rights, rather than gain them; the apparent failure to appreciate the justice protective function of the power of pardon itself; and the absence of inbuilt trigger mechanisms in the law to monitor possible abuse of the power.

Journal

African Journal of International and Comparative LawEdinburgh University Press

Published: Aug 1, 2022

There are no references for this article.