Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
This article explores the nature of record linkage in conventional family reconstitution studies, building upon previous pieces in this journal. It argues that the record linkage process on which reconstitution is based compromises the results obtained in two ways. First, it generates bias in the types of life-cycle detected. Second, because it assumes that potential links without obvious competition should be made, it generates a range of incorrect linkages. This article suggests that a better approach to life and demography in early modern communities might lie in the reconstruction of enriched life-cycles from which demographic data can be culled, rather than the explicit creation of demographic sub-samples.
International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing – Edinburgh University Press
Published: Jan 1, 1996
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.