Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement

Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement COMMON KNOWLEDGE This short, multiply problematic book could have been much shorter, for its authors' thesis is quickly stated: given humankind's increasing ability to destroy itself and the possibility of future life, radical solutions need to be adopted to save us all. First, we should set aside alleged rights to privacy in order to support surveillance that could uncover terrorists with access to weapons of mass destruction. Second, given the weaknesses that twenty-five hundred years of traditional moral education have failed to correct, we should support biotechnology that provides the moral enhancement that could increase our chances for survival. As the authors rightly argue, liberal democracies are poorly suited to combat climate change, the most imminent threat we face. Politicians seeking reelection are in no position to impose the drastic reductions in population and the restrictions on travel and on eating meat that are needed to bring consumption in affluent countries down to sustainable levels. Here the authors raise questions that need to be faced: we may acknowledge the ways in which dictatorships have abused (alleged) states of emergency and still be convinced that present conditions require emergency measures involving surveillance. Any right I may have to privacy http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Common Knowledge Duke University Press

Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement

Common Knowledge , Volume 22 (2) – May 1, 2016

Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement


COMMON KNOWLEDGE This short, multiply problematic book could have been much shorter, for its authors' thesis is quickly stated: given humankind's increasing ability to destroy itself and the possibility of future life, radical solutions need to be adopted to save us all. First, we should set aside alleged rights to privacy in order to support surveillance that could uncover terrorists with access to weapons of mass destruction. Second, given the weaknesses that twenty-five hundred years of traditional moral education have failed to correct, we should support biotechnology that provides the moral enhancement that could increase our chances for survival. As the authors rightly argue, liberal democracies are poorly suited to combat climate change, the most imminent threat we face. Politicians seeking reelection are in no position to impose the drastic reductions in population and the restrictions on travel and on eating meat that are needed to bring consumption in affluent countries down to sustainable levels. Here the authors raise questions that need to be faced: we may acknowledge the ways in which dictatorships have abused (alleged) states of emergency and still be convinced that present conditions require emergency measures involving surveillance. Any right I may have to privacy pales in the face of my, and my fellows', right not to be extinguished by terrorists who obtain biological or nuclear weapons. But the authors' central argument falls spectacularly flat. The reader who wades through nine chapters detailing our grim prospects for survival will hope for a more robust perspective in the final one: "Moral Enhancement as a Possible Way Out." Alas, the authors' hopes for biological enhancement rest on a tiny number of experiments with oxytocin and SSRIs, whose results, they acknowledge, raise as many questions as they resolve. Given this, and their skepticism about technological solutions in the case of climate change, it...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/duke-university-press/unfit-for-the-future-the-need-for-moral-enhancement-TcXIjH2Nki

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Duke University Press
Copyright
Copyright © Duke Univ Press
ISSN
0961-754X
eISSN
1538-4578
DOI
10.1215/0961754X-3487808
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

COMMON KNOWLEDGE This short, multiply problematic book could have been much shorter, for its authors' thesis is quickly stated: given humankind's increasing ability to destroy itself and the possibility of future life, radical solutions need to be adopted to save us all. First, we should set aside alleged rights to privacy in order to support surveillance that could uncover terrorists with access to weapons of mass destruction. Second, given the weaknesses that twenty-five hundred years of traditional moral education have failed to correct, we should support biotechnology that provides the moral enhancement that could increase our chances for survival. As the authors rightly argue, liberal democracies are poorly suited to combat climate change, the most imminent threat we face. Politicians seeking reelection are in no position to impose the drastic reductions in population and the restrictions on travel and on eating meat that are needed to bring consumption in affluent countries down to sustainable levels. Here the authors raise questions that need to be faced: we may acknowledge the ways in which dictatorships have abused (alleged) states of emergency and still be convinced that present conditions require emergency measures involving surveillance. Any right I may have to privacy

Journal

Common KnowledgeDuke University Press

Published: May 1, 2016

There are no references for this article.