Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Schoenberg, timbre was invariably organized in an intuitive manner. Nor was the problem of timbre solved by serial composers. In spite of the appearances of rationality, the serialization of timbre was essentially arbitrarily determined. Who, after all, will without qualification agree that the relation between the timbres of violin and contrabass is the same as, say, between the violin and oboe or trumpet con sordino? Assumptions of this sort lie at the base of the timbre rows used in serial compositions. For the young Penderecki, faced with the Gordian knot of timbre, nothing remained to do but to cut it. He did so by transferring wholesale the problematic issue of timbre from the hopelessly muddled acoustic level onto the motoric one: the level of sound generation. I. Categories Although the acoustic wave is a highly complex phenomenon, the process of its generation can be presented simply as a collision of two physical bodies, one being a sound source, the other being the body that vibrates the sound source. It is likely that such a splendidly simplified image of the sound-producing process was taken up by Penderecki from the teaching of MieczysÅaw Drobner, the eminent Polish acoustician and organologist.
Journal of Music Theory – Duke University Press
Published: Jan 1, 2001
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.