Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Downloaded from http://read.dukeupress.edu/common-knowledge/article-pdf/27/1/121/867430/0270121.pdf by DEEPDYVE INC user on 30 March 2022 the most adventurous and best, though also the most problematical. In it, Lear’s self- drawn caricatures— as an uncle, for example, or a baby— are paid special attention. Still, a self- drawn caricature is not the same as a verbal self- description. Uncles require nephews or nieces; an image requires nothing. Thus you cannot quite draw an uncle. Self- invention, moreover, suggests a level of control that even Genghis Khan may not have possessed. It is largely a flattering myth for educated audiences. Lodge appears to be on safer grounds when she endorses G. K. Chesterton’s advice that “we accept [Lear] as a purely fabulous g fi ure, on his own description of himself.” That Lear has become a purely fabulous figure to so many people has little to do with self- description. After all, most of us tend to self- describe ad nauseam, and no one pays attention. To understand our present attitude toward Lear as “purely fabulous,” we need to understand the widespread acts of acceptance that mostly vanished, large communities once made. These were communities in which uncles, babies, and “vast awful bulldogs,” all averse
Common Knowledge – Duke University Press
Published: Jan 1, 2021
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.