Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Tragedy of Limitless Growth: Re-Interpreting the Tragedy of the Commons for a Century of Climate Change

The Tragedy of Limitless Growth: Re-Interpreting the Tragedy of the Commons for a Century of... This article argues that Garrett Hardin's primary object of critique in his influential “The Tragedy of the Commons” is not the commons or shared property at all—as is almost universally assumed by Hardin's critics—but is rather Adam Smith's theory of markets and its viability for protecting scarce resources. On the basis of this revised understanding this article then offers a different interpretation of Hardin's thesis by assigning hermeneutic priority to the concept of “tragedy” (Aristotle, Nietzsche) rather than the concept of the “commons.” Read through the concept of tragedy, it argues that Hardin's thesis effectively asserts a rigid incompatibility between market economics and environmental protection, and to this extent “The Tragedy of the Commons” is more aptly read as a political critique that questions the viability of unlimited growth as the axiomatic premise of planetary economics. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Environmental Humanities Duke University Press

The Tragedy of Limitless Growth: Re-Interpreting the Tragedy of the Commons for a Century of Climate Change

MacLellan, Matthew
Environmental Humanities , Volume 7 (1) – May 1, 2016
Download PDF
18 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/duke-university-press/the-tragedy-of-limitless-growth-re-interpreting-the-tragedy-of-the-kn20IukiL1

References (14)

Copyright
Copyright: © MacLellan 2015
ISSN
2201-1919
eISSN
2201-1919
DOI
10.1215/22011919-3616326
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This article argues that Garrett Hardin's primary object of critique in his influential “The Tragedy of the Commons” is not the commons or shared property at all—as is almost universally assumed by Hardin's critics—but is rather Adam Smith's theory of markets and its viability for protecting scarce resources. On the basis of this revised understanding this article then offers a different interpretation of Hardin's thesis by assigning hermeneutic priority to the concept of “tragedy” (Aristotle, Nietzsche) rather than the concept of the “commons.” Read through the concept of tragedy, it argues that Hardin's thesis effectively asserts a rigid incompatibility between market economics and environmental protection, and to this extent “The Tragedy of the Commons” is more aptly read as a political critique that questions the viability of unlimited growth as the axiomatic premise of planetary economics.

Journal

Environmental Humanities – Duke University Press

Published: May 1, 2016

There are no references for this article.