Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Spring 2000 course is the Hong Kong fantasy embodied in postcards and coffee-table books that fetishistically, even vulgarly, builds on the glittering prosperity of the city; this fantasy is invariably taken as the totem representing Hong Kong and contextualizing the meanings of this long-colonial urban site. As a consequence of these perceptions, the hardships of poverty have been, so to speak, petriï¬ed, distanced as a faraway historical periodâ archaeologically termed the Age of Povertyâ and thus, in effect, removed from the presentday social memory of Hong Kong.3 In this way, poverty and the impoverished are suppressed by this glittering totem and are effectively removed from the social agenda. Yet however powerful, the establishment of Hong Kong has not been miraculous enough to make its bit of barren granite grow. From the very beginning the British colonial government used its monopoly land control to turn a handsome proï¬t through the practice of âfairâ public auctions. In the meantime, the speculations of capitalist proï¬teers siphoned off much of the most desirable property. The end result of this laissezfaire political-economic structure is that land in Hong Kong is a highly speculative commodity and among the most expensive real estate in the
positions asia critique – Duke University Press
Published: Mar 1, 2000
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.