Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
0 1995 by Duke University Press rethinking of basic premises represents a coming-to-terms with differences that are not absolutes but are ambiguous, flexible, and confusing; as we are no ler sure who they really are, we cannot know for sure who we are. For old-fashioned western liberals, diaspora offered the fantasy of the melting pot, made entirely of Anglo-American norms and values, in which others become âmore like us.â For the New Left, global immigration promised a nation of cultural hybrids, a kind of intercultural subjectivity fostering new, transnational solidarities against totalitarian forces and rabid nationalism on the one hand and the excesses of capitalist and environmental exploitation on the other. Yet, increasingly, immigrants from a newly affluent Asia are more concerned with free trade than human rights, and the economic successes of their countries of origin challenge U.S. civic faith that full-fledged democracy and capitalism go hand in hand. Another U.S. assumption about immigrants is also being undermined by the influx of Asians in the aftermath of the Indochina War. To most Americans, immigration from communist countries reaffirms the United Statesâ notion of itself as a refuge for political exiles and confirms its image as a bastion
positions asia critique – Duke University Press
Published: Dec 1, 1995
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.