Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
positions 11:1 Spring 2003 difference of the Taiwanese âbarbarians.â For Xu, such forms of violence and image-making mark a difference so extreme that the civilized and the savage are ï¬lled with utter hatred for each other, making them âï¬ght to the deathâ should they encounter each other.2 Ling Changyan identiï¬ed this fascination with âbarbarous landscapesâ of âprimitive desireâ in a 1934 text as a speciï¬cally urban phenomenon, claiming that âmodern lifeâs essential element is the return to primitive savagery.â3 Yet perhaps it would be more accurate to say that the essential element of primitive savagery was its circulation within modern life. For many of these texts and images were produced abroad, and many others were produced all over China, but the Shanghai media during this period showed a strong interest in collecting, sometimes sponsoring, and publishing such representations. Under the epithets savage and primitive, such representations conï¬ated not only the peoples of Chinaâs frontier regions, but also the peoples of Africa and the South Paciï¬c. (In order to avoid a tedious overuse of scare quotes, I will assume the readerâs awareness of the racist connotations of savage, primitive, and civilized, and that my attempt to read Republican Shanghai
positions asia critique – Duke University Press
Published: Mar 1, 2003
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.