Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Queering Pedagogy in the English Classroom: Engaging with the Places Where Thinking Stops Amy E. Winans In recent years, gender, race, and class have increasingly received attention in literature and writing classrooms and in the scholarship of critical pedagogy. In contrast, sexual orientation has much more frequently been glossed over or even ignored. Yet silences in most classrooms about sexual orientation are in striking contrast to public, political conversations — most recently about gay marriage, homosexuality, and church practices — and to slang used fre- quently by students. On my campus, for example, the expression “that’s so gay” is used daily by students to criticize everything from a boring class to an outdated piece of clothing. Discussions about and references to sexual orientation and sexual difference are so common outside the classroom that it is hardly surprising that when the silence is broken inside the classroom the results are marked by strong student engagement — and by types of discourse that are often absent there. Indeed, when sexual orientation is referenced in articles about pedagogy, such as Richard E. Miller’s well-known 1994 essay “Fault Lines in the Contact Zone: Assessing Homophobic Student Writing,” it is often identified as something
Pedagogy – Duke University Press
Published: Jan 1, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.