Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S y m p o s i u m : D e v a l u e d C u r r e n c y, P a r t 2 PARADIGMS LOST From Göttingen to Berlin Peter Burke As Karl Mannheim pointed out long ago, the idea of competition is a fruitful one for understanding intellectual and cultural history, no less than economic history.1 Competition between individuals is obvious enough, but there is also competition between styles â between Gothic and Renaissance architecture, for example â and between theories, as in the case of the competition between the models of the universe associated with Ptolemy and Copernicus. It was, of course, the example of Copernicus, whose work he had studied, that inspired Thomas Kuhnâs much-discussed concept of a paradigm.2 A paradigm acts like a cultural grid or filter. In other words, it allows some aspects of reality to be seen more clearly at the expense of hiding others. To take a well-known example from the humanities: the Malinowski paradigm of fieldwork in anthropology transformed the discipline and led to many positive achievements. However, these benefits had their costs. Their price â as in the case of the
Common Knowledge – Duke University Press
Published: Apr 1, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.