Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Bishop (2018)
Felo de seboundary 2
M. Featherstone (2021)
Žižek's PandemicCultural Politics: An International Journal, 17
Claire Colebrook (2020)
Fire, Flood and Pestilence as the Condition for the Possibility of the HumanDerrida Today, 13
B. Stiegler, A. Boever (2017)
The Proletarianization of Sensibilityboundary 2, 44
N. Mansfield (2020)
Doing UndoingDerrida Today
David Wills (2020)
Crown of SpikesDerrida Today
B. Schneider, L. Walsh (2019)
The politics of zoom: Problems with downscaling climate visualizationsGeo: Geography and Environment
P. Lemmens, Yuk Hui (2017)
Reframing the Technosphere: Peter Sloterdijk and Bernard Stiegler’s Anthropotechnological Diagnoses of the AnthropoceneKrisis, 2017
V. Duclos (2019)
Falling into things: Peter Sloterdijk, ontological anthropology in the monstrousnew formations: a journal of culture/theory/politics, 95
B. Schneider, T. Nocke (2014)
Image Politics of Climate Change: IntroductionImage Politics of Climate Change
S. Tuinen (2007)
Critique beyond resentment: an introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s jovial modernityCultural Politics: An International Journal, 3
Boris Groys (2019)
Art PowerAnthologie Kulturpolitik
J. Armitage (2021)
On the World of the Virus: Remaking Image Theory AnewCultural Politics, 17
C. Gray (2021)
Virus is a Language: COVID-19 and the New AbnormalCultural Politics, 17
Wendy Chun (2011)
Crisis, Crisis, Crisis, or Sovereignty and NetworksTheory, Culture & Society, 28
L. Gurevitch (2014)
Google WarmingConvergence, 20
T. Sampson, J. Parikka (2021)
The Operational Loops of a PandemicCultural Politics, 17
(1999)
Speaking into the Air
J. Parikka (2012)
New Materialism as Media Theory: Medianatures and Dirty MatterCommunication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 9
Peters (1999)
10.7208/chicago/9780226922638.001.0001
B. Latour, S. Muecke (2021)
Protective MeasuresCultural Politics
Ethan Stoneman (2020)
After Englobement: Carl Schmitt, Peter Sloterdijk, and the Rediscovery of the UncompressibleCultural Politics, 16
I. Goh (2021)
Virus is other PeopleCultural Politics, 17
J. Parikka (2013)
INSECTS AND CANARIES: medianatures and aesthetics of the invisibleAngelaki, 18
Schneider (2014)
Image Politics of Climate Change: Introduction
G. Moore (2019)
Automations, Technological and Nervous: Addiction Epidemics from Athens to Fake Newsnew formations: a journal of culture/theory/politics, 98
T. Campbell (2011)
Improper Life: Technology and Biopolitics from Heidegger to Agamben
P. North (2016)
Absolute Teacher, Sloterdijkboundary 2, 43
(2020)
Beware: Medical Police
(2017)
Dopamining and Disadjustment: Addiction to Digital Capitalism
J. Weinstein (2020)
The New Wild West: Risk, Viral Politics, and the Emergence of EpigeneticsMosaic: an interdisciplinary critical journal, 53
H. Oosterling (2007)
Interest and Excess of Modern Man’s Radical Mediocrity: Rescaling Sloterdijk’s Grandiose Aesthetic StrategyCultural Politics, 3
S. Žižek (2020)
Pandemic!: COVID-19 Shakes the World
This article takes up German philosopher Peter Sloterdijk's attention to air and atmospheres to argue for the influential part “objective” thinking plays in disseminating viral pandemics. It follows Sloterdijk's broad approach to “air-conditioning” to interpret the way modern cultures increasingly work to explicate and construct objective figures of (and in) air. A fundamental, yet invisible, “anthropopoietic” element, air resists the forms and figures we use to describe it. This is acutely demonstrated by airborne viruses like COVID-19 and the pandemics they create, where the medial willingness to perceive or “figure” the air becomes a critical, everyday necessity. When Sloterdijk attributes the spread of “affective epidemics” to mass-media technologies, he draws attention to how airborne transmission is a symptom of breathing the same air, which, by affecting and altering air-conditions to reproduce identical figures all across the globe, increases its spread. This article argues that the willingness to make air objective—in both senses of identifying its material properties, and believing in a uniform or consensus figure—eradicates the possibility of vital difference. In doing so, inhabiting what Sloterdijk calls the “World Interior” of reproducible sameness that props up international exchange, modern, globalized culture becomes far more susceptible to the rapid spread of epidemics. Virality is increased by the sameness of objective air-conditioning, and by reintroducing difference into the atmosphere we can bring back its life-giving potential.
Cultural Politics – Duke University Press
Published: Jul 1, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.