Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1976)
Europe's self-maintenance was sustained only through its self-expansion
P. Lacoue-Labarthe (1990)
Heidegger, Art, And Politics
(1964)
Things with form were empty when placed beside sand. The only certain factor was its movement; sand was the antithesis of all form
George Wilson, J. Koschmann (1996)
Revolution and subjectivity in postwar Japan
Following this reasoning, one may say that just as signification is an "invention" of the West, so too must the West be an invention of signification
(1952)
Koteki to Dūi
K. Nishida, M. Abe, C. Ives
An Inquiry into the Good
Jean-Luc Nancy (1986)
L'oubli de la philosophie
Fujino Sensei
(1985)
As Nakagawa Ikurō explains, this notion of "self-negation" (jiko hitei) is central to Takeuchi's political project of "permanent revolution
G. Hegel, Arnold Miller, John Findlay (1979)
Phenomenology of spiritPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research, 39
Kōbō Abe (1962)
The Woman in the Dunes
S. Hart, G. Hegel, H. Harris, T. Knox (1981)
System of Ethical Life and First Philosophy of SpiritPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research, 41
positions 8:2 Fall 2000 that it contains within it the conditions of impossibility of subjectivity as well. Here one must confront the radical implications of this insight for our understanding of history. The elusive movement or force of history cannot be domesticated by a historiography that insists on taking as its object of research the subject, which poses itself in all its unity and integrity. Viewing history as a history of subjects (for example, Japanese history, Chinese history) reveals that the empiricity that is the domain of historiography is in fact contained within, or subsumed under, the ideal unit that is the individual subject. As Takeuchi suggests, this understanding of history is inescapably theoretical; that is, it is based on the primacy of vision (theoria), regardless of course of whether historiography consciously recognizes this character or not. What disturbs this traditional relationship in historiography between the subject and history may here be understood as historicity, according to which the subjectâs thoroughly historical being reveals not the activity of its formation but rather its fundamental passivity in the world. This passivity, let us emphasize, is originary. Before the subject assumes its proper unity qua subject, then, it is necessarily
positions asia critique – Duke University Press
Published: Sep 1, 2000
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.