Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
192 The Joumal of" Korean Studies pr esent ed as any thing but a tactical game. It resul ted in ro lling heads ra ther than a working coalition of na tional left and national center. Another pro blem is the book ·s broa d coverage, a prob lem that most works in the countr y studies tradition share: try ing to discuss too many areas-po li tics, theater, cinema, education, econo mics, women's rights, and so for th. Do ing so, of course, lim its the author to shal low wa ters. Many areas are touched, but none is treated in depth, and the author fails to employ any theoretical framework deve loped in such areas as fil m studies, lite rat ure , or economics. By default, such holisti c studies tend to be bl oo dless and hard to read, and while Armstrong succeeds in bringing to life a villa ge boy who is struggling with Korean orthography ("I wood lik to get a lot of ejjucashun nex tim" p. 104 ), the political and cu ltural fig ures discussed remain merely names men tioned in pa ssing. Armstrong does displa y some nuance in his
Journal of Korean Studies – Duke University Press
Published: Sep 1, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.