Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. McClure, James Purdy (2016)
The Future Scholar: Researching and Teaching the Frameworks for Writing and Information Literacy
Jonathan Buehl, Tamar Chute, A. Fields (2012)
Training in the Archives: Archival Research as Professional Development.College Composition and Communication, 64
Pamela VanHaitsma (2015)
New Pedagogical Engagements with Archives: Student Inquiry and Composing in Digital SpacesCollege English, 78
(2002)
Claiming the Archive for Rhetoric and Composition
Chadwick Sterling (2017)
An Analysis of the Relationship Between 4 Automated Writing Evaluation Software and the Outcomes in the Writing Program Administrator’s “WPA Outcomes for First Year Composition”
A. McCain (2017)
The Confines of Experience: Composition Studies' Priorities in the Framework for Success in Postsecondary Writing.
Hugh Taylor (2010)
Clio in the Raw: Archival Materials and the Teaching of HistoryAmerican Archivist
R. McClure, James Purdy (2014)
The Next Digital Scholar: A Fresh Approach to the Common Core State Standards in Research and Writing
J. Enoch, Pamela VanHaitsma (2015)
Archival Literacy: Reading the Rhetoric of Digital Archives in the Undergraduate ClassroomCollege Composition and Communication, 67
J. Enoch, J. Jack (2016)
Remembering Sappho: New Perspectives on Teaching (and Writing) Women's Rhetorical HistoryCollege English, 73
Gary Olson (2003)
Rhetoric and composition as intellectual workCollege Composition and Communication, 55
W. Hayden (2015)
"Gifts" of the Archives: A Pedagogy for Undergraduate ResearchCollege Composition and Communication, 66
Rhetoric and composition scholars have recently called our attention to the value of archival research in the undergraduate classroom, leading to rich collaborations with archivists and librarians at many institutions. As we engaged our own pedagogical collaboration as a university archivist and English faculty member, we realized that, though we might use slightly different language to articulate them or cite different sources in support of them, many of our learning goals overlapped. As we explored these goals together, we realized that they evidenced a correspondence in our disciplines that we had not explored—one that is reflected in our fields’ recent outcomes statements: the 2011 Framework for Success in Postsecondary Writing and 2016 Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. In this article, we briefly describe our course and use it as a touch point for comparing these disciplinary statements. We argue that analysis of the overlap between these two documents helps us articulate a new set of reasons for faculty to connect with their allies in libraries and archives to teach undergraduate research and writing.
Pedagogy – Duke University Press
Published: Jan 1, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.