Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2018)
Nanmin p'obiawa han'guk chŏngch'ijŏk chŏngdongŭi shigansŏng
Hui Zhou, Ling Zhu (2019)
“Two Chinas”: Social Equity, Social Policies, and the Urban-Rural Divide in ChinaSocial Equity in the Asia-Pacific Region
Rhoda Margesson, Emma Chanlett-Avery, Andorra Bruno (2007)
North Korean Refugees in China and Human Rights Issues: International Response and U.S. Policy Options
J. Duckett (2020)
Neoliberalism, Authoritarian Politics and Social Policy in ChinaDevelopment and Change
H. Park (2015)
The Capitalist Unconscious: From Korean Unification to Transnational Korea
This article examines the humanistic relationship between Korean Chinese and North Korean refugees on the Sino–North Korean border in Zhang Lu's film Dooman River (2010) and delineates how the ethical obligation to “our” people, or brethren (dongpo), is removed by understanding North Koreans as potential criminals. The first part conceptualizes Korean Chinese villagers’ ethical obligation toward North Koreans, which I call ethnic ethos, and focuses on how the director preserves the Korean Chinese's conscience by stereotyping North Korean border crossers as “dangerous refugees.” The second part focuses on the meaning of ethnic identity that the director pursues, offering insights into the crisis of community in the context of urbanization and globalization, or the “Korean dream.” The two types of border crossing—the crossing of North Koreans to China and the crossing of Korean Chinese to South Korea—offer clues to the causes of the crisis of community, in which collective ethics and responsibility to others have been eroded. This article answers questions about the death of a Korean Chinese boy, who voluntarily becomes a stranger by entering into the zone of “nonlife” or refugees. I argue that the boy's death is a sacrifice suggested to audiences by the director in an attempt to preserve the communitarian ethics of Korean Chinese and maintain the value of ethnic identity.
positions asia critique – Duke University Press
Published: Nov 1, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.