Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Comparative and Integrative History in Ottoman and Turkish Women’s and Gender Studies

Comparative and Integrative History in Ottoman and Turkish Women’s and Gender Studies Downloaded from http://read.dukeupress.edu/jmews/article-pdf/17/3/492/1169819/492torunoglu.pdf by DEEPDYVE INC user on 30 March 2022 THIRD S PACE Roundtable: Gende r ed Tra n snationalisms in the M idd l e E as t a nd North Africa Comparative and Integrative History in Ottoman and Turkish Women’s and Gender Studies GÜL Ş AH Ş ENK O L T OR UNO Ğ LU omen’s and gender history began to move in a comparative direction during W the late 1990s, opening up new possibilities in scholarship about Western and non-Western contexts alike. Sonya Michel (1998: 189) asked, “Why the comparative turn, and why now?” According to Michel, “The proliferation of historical knowl- edge about women and gender invites broad cross-cultural and transhistorical comparisons” (190) and a “collective commitmenttofighting national parochialism” (Rupp 2008: 33; see also Offen 2010). However, this is not the only reason. The field of women’s and gender history is inherently comparative and itself invites, gener- ates, and even requires a comparative framework to understand when,where, under what conditions, and in which forms patriarchy exists, persists, or weakens. This is especially true for Middle Eastern and North African contexts, where scholar- ship on gender is often directly pertinent to women’s rights activism (Booth http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Middle East Women's Studies Duke University Press

Comparative and Integrative History in Ottoman and Turkish Women’s and Gender Studies

Loading next page...
 
/lp/duke-university-press/comparative-and-integrative-history-in-ottoman-and-turkish-women-s-and-eJ01xXubR2
Copyright
Copyright © 2021 by the Association for Middle East Women’s Studies
ISSN
1552-5864
eISSN
1558-9579
DOI
10.1215/15525864-9307014
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Downloaded from http://read.dukeupress.edu/jmews/article-pdf/17/3/492/1169819/492torunoglu.pdf by DEEPDYVE INC user on 30 March 2022 THIRD S PACE Roundtable: Gende r ed Tra n snationalisms in the M idd l e E as t a nd North Africa Comparative and Integrative History in Ottoman and Turkish Women’s and Gender Studies GÜL Ş AH Ş ENK O L T OR UNO Ğ LU omen’s and gender history began to move in a comparative direction during W the late 1990s, opening up new possibilities in scholarship about Western and non-Western contexts alike. Sonya Michel (1998: 189) asked, “Why the comparative turn, and why now?” According to Michel, “The proliferation of historical knowl- edge about women and gender invites broad cross-cultural and transhistorical comparisons” (190) and a “collective commitmenttofighting national parochialism” (Rupp 2008: 33; see also Offen 2010). However, this is not the only reason. The field of women’s and gender history is inherently comparative and itself invites, gener- ates, and even requires a comparative framework to understand when,where, under what conditions, and in which forms patriarchy exists, persists, or weakens. This is especially true for Middle Eastern and North African contexts, where scholar- ship on gender is often directly pertinent to women’s rights activism (Booth

Journal

Journal of Middle East Women's StudiesDuke University Press

Published: Nov 1, 2021

References