Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
positions 3:2 Fall 1995 T h e postcolonial condition in those countries is a situation in which the notion that the empire disappeared after the war is gradually being exposed by the destabilization of recently developed nation-states. This is probably also a process in which the postwar national consciousness, which was formed as memories of empire were forgotten, ceaselessly reawakens to those memories. From his understanding of the postwar world order as a new continuation of colonialism, Masao Miyoshi questions the ability of academic discourse to inscribe this situation.* While this is a problem for the recently popular variety of studies related to cultural difference, it first and foremost calls for another critical examination of the relationship between colonialism and academic discourse. My attempt to deal with academic discourse in the Southern Islands (nanâyoguntd)controlled by Japan over the thirty years from their military occupation in 1914 to their âshattering jewelâ demises (gyo&az) in World War 11, is based on this problematic. What we need to be careful of is that this kind of examination does not end as a mere inquiry into whether scientific research was used in the control of the colonies. This understanding of academics as
positions asia critique – Duke University Press
Published: Sep 1, 1995
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.