Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Nathalie Bouloux (2003)
Jean de Mandeville, Le Livre des merveilles du monde, édition critique par Christiane Deluz. Paris, Éditions du CNRS, 2000 (Coll. Sources d'Histoire Médiévale, 31)
M. Gosman (1982)
La lettre du prêtre Jean. Les versions en ancien francais et en ancien occitan
Thomas Hall, R. Bartlett (1995)
The Making of Europe: Conquest, Colonization and Cultural Change 950-1350.Contemporary Sociology, 24
Carolyn Dinshaw (1999)
Getting Medieval: Sexualities and Communities, Pre- and Postmodern
Tattersall (1988)
ANTHROPOPHAGI AND EATERS OF RAW FLESH IN FRENCH LITERATURE OF THE CRUSADE PERIOD: MYTH, TRADITION AND REALITYMedium Aevum, 57
Kathleen Biddick (1999)
The shock of medievalism
Iris Origo (1955)
The Domestic Enemy: The Eastern Slaves in Tuscany in the Fourteenth and Fifteenth CenturiesSpeculum, 30
J. Crick (1991)
The Historia regum Britannie of Geoffrey of Monmouth, IV. Dissemination and reception in the later Middle Ages
E. Burns (2002)
Courtly Love Undressed: Reading Through Clothes in Medieval French Culture
G. Spiegel (2000)
Épater les MédiévistesHistory and Theory, 39
During the course of the last decade here has been sustained reflection on intersections between medieval studies and postcolonial theory, the books reviewed here being just a sample of the scholarship now available. But postcolonial approaches to the Middle Ages have proved controversial. Indeed, in the view of some medievalists the Middle Ages cannot be "postcolonial," because the term by definition refers to historical circumstances and cultures that emerged only after the disintegration of the global empires that were formed in the modern period by European powers such as England, France, and Spain. The intellectual challenges for "postcolonial medievalists" are therefore not negligible, particularly when considering that the model of periodization that is widely (but usually tacitly and uncritically) accepted in postcolonial studies casts the Middle Ages as an undifferentiated, homogenous "Other." However, just as medievalists have something to learn from postcolonial theory, so postcolonial theorists might have something to learn about the history and specificity of their own field of inquiry from a better-informed view of the past. This essay offers an appreciative account of, and response to, some recent scholarship in the field of postcolonial medieval studies. It is suggested that postcolonial medieval studies requires 1) working outside the framework of a single literary tradition, since few texts in the Middle Ages were produced solely within such a limited context; 2) working across different languages and understanding the dissemination and use of different languages in the Middle Ages; 3) returning to manuscripts and/or revising the canon, rather than relying on critical editions produced in a tradition of modern national literary histories that is bound to occlude important evidence of cultural contact and hybridities; and 4) recognizing that the insights afforded by postcolonial theory give us a better understanding of how "Europe" came into being, how it related to the rest of the world, and how the medieval history of contact between Europe and Asia or Africa is in fact an important element of the longer history of which colonialism and postcolonialism are part.
Comparative Literature – Duke University Press
Published: Jan 1, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.