Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
L e n n a r d J . D a v i s / D a v i d B. M o r r i s n the 1960s it was still a radical prem ise th a t the analysis o f lite rature needed to con sid e r h is to ry and cultu re.T he stand alone, value-free m odel o f N ew C riticism made ear lie r attem p ts to historicize literature o r to place specific lite rary w o rks in th e ir cultural context seem old-fashioned.Today, by contrast, it is com m o np lace to see lite ra ry texts and classroom curricula illu m in a te d th ro u g h a study o f h isto ry and culture, w h ile num erous th e oretical perspectives, fro m fe m in ism s to co g n itive post-structuralism , have enriched under standing o f both h is to ry and culture. Literary history, in this sense, lends itself to continuous reinvention. So at the be g in n in g o f the tw e n
English Language Notes – Duke University Press
Published: Mar 1, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.