Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Afterword: Conversing with the Good Left about PRC History

Afterword: Conversing with the Good Left about PRC History Downloaded from http://read.dukeupress.edu/positions/article-pdf/29/4/895/1194605/895kiely.pdf by DEEPDYVE INC user on 02 April 2022 Jan Kiely Something Unusual This has been an unusual experience. As an outsider to the PRC History Group and an anonymous reviewer, I had not expected to be invited to add this commentary at the last minute. How could I say no? Aminda Smith, Fabio Lanza, and their group’s engagement with the criticisms and ques- tions posed to them, their passion for the subject, and their commitment to substantive dialogues with those who think and work differently from themselves are admirable. I am happy to continue the conversation. There is much to recommend in these pages that I will assign to my graduate students. This includes useful sections on sources and methodol- ogy, especially the innovative sources analyzed by Sigrid Schmalzer and Smith’s call to “map the grain” of Maoist sources. The inquiries into the relationship between methods and theoretical frameworks for this period positions 29:4 doi 10.1215/10679847-9286753 Copyright 2021 by Duke University Press Downloaded from http://read.dukeupress.edu/positions/article-pdf/29/4/895/1194605/895kiely.pdf by DEEPDYVE INC user on 02 April 2022 positions 29:4 November 2021 896 opens a path well worth pursuing with sustained effort. The self- ree fl ction called for throughout — http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png positions Duke University Press

Afterword: Conversing with the Good Left about PRC History

Kiely, Jan
positions , Volume 29 (4) – Nov 1, 2021
Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/duke-university-press/afterword-conversing-with-the-good-left-about-prc-history-Vl8oEkzsZo

References (41)

Copyright
Copyright 2021 by Duke University Press
ISSN
1067-9847
eISSN
1527-8271
DOI
10.1215/10679847-9286753
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Downloaded from http://read.dukeupress.edu/positions/article-pdf/29/4/895/1194605/895kiely.pdf by DEEPDYVE INC user on 02 April 2022 Jan Kiely Something Unusual This has been an unusual experience. As an outsider to the PRC History Group and an anonymous reviewer, I had not expected to be invited to add this commentary at the last minute. How could I say no? Aminda Smith, Fabio Lanza, and their group’s engagement with the criticisms and ques- tions posed to them, their passion for the subject, and their commitment to substantive dialogues with those who think and work differently from themselves are admirable. I am happy to continue the conversation. There is much to recommend in these pages that I will assign to my graduate students. This includes useful sections on sources and methodol- ogy, especially the innovative sources analyzed by Sigrid Schmalzer and Smith’s call to “map the grain” of Maoist sources. The inquiries into the relationship between methods and theoretical frameworks for this period positions 29:4 doi 10.1215/10679847-9286753 Copyright 2021 by Duke University Press Downloaded from http://read.dukeupress.edu/positions/article-pdf/29/4/895/1194605/895kiely.pdf by DEEPDYVE INC user on 02 April 2022 positions 29:4 November 2021 896 opens a path well worth pursuing with sustained effort. The self- ree fl ction called for throughout —

Journal

positions – Duke University Press

Published: Nov 1, 2021

There are no references for this article.