Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Commen tar y A Report from a Writing Program Director in the Trenches: TAs and Unionization Gail Stygall Slaves of public education, Rise and wake a sleeping nation! Break the chains of your privation! For the union makes us strong! —“Poli Sci Department Strike Song,” sung to the chorus of “The Battle Hymn of the Republic,” Seattle, June 2001 Discharges of discontent crackling through the atmosphere, the teaching assistants (TAs) at the University of Washington moved toward a strike during the spring quarter of 2001. As the end of the spring quarter approached, the faculty knew that negotiations between the university’s administration and the Graduate Student Employee Action Coalition (GSEAC/UAW) were failing. Though the university’s president had reversed the long-term policy of not considering graduate students employees and had agreed, under very specific circumstances, to recognize a graduate student employee union (much to the dismay of some), resolution and agreement were far away. The state of Wash- ington had a quirk: the only public employees denied the right to unionize were the faculty and instructional staff of the six four-year institutions. With- out “enabling” legislation, the administration claimed, there could be no union. We on the faculty had been
Pedagogy – Duke University Press
Published: Jan 1, 2003
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.