Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A. B. Marx’s Sonatenform Coming to Terms with Beethoven’s Rhetoric

A. B. Marx’s Sonatenform Coming to Terms with Beethoven’s Rhetoric It is to A. B. Marx that we owe the first extended discussion of sonata form and a conception of it that has survived in classrooms and rehearsal halls to this day. At the same time, Marx’s Sonatenform and his treatment of it are beset with what seem to be serious flaws, chief among which is the absence of a single example of a complete movement from existing music that embodies the form. Taking the perceived weaknesses of his discussion as a starting point, I argue that they are in fact the result of an ambitious and sophisticated approach to form, which depends on a more thorough understanding of the larger body of Marx’s theory of forms, and specifically of the forms immediately preceding sonata form in Marx’s discussion. As a consequence, it is possible not only to reassess the apparent shortcomings of Marx’s original formulation but also to see sonata form itself less as a mere codification of formal elements than as a means of coming to terms with the music it considers. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Music Theory Duke University Press

A. B. Marx’s Sonatenform Coming to Terms with Beethoven’s Rhetoric

Uribe, Patrick Wood
Journal of Music Theory , Volume 55 (2) – Sep 21, 2011
Download PDF
32 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/duke-university-press/a-b-marx-s-sonatenform-coming-to-terms-with-beethoven-s-rhetoric-sl5w80ywNH
Publisher
Duke University Press
Copyright
Copyright © Duke Univ Press
ISSN
0022-2909
eISSN
1941-7497
DOI
10.1215/00222909-1540356
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

It is to A. B. Marx that we owe the first extended discussion of sonata form and a conception of it that has survived in classrooms and rehearsal halls to this day. At the same time, Marx’s Sonatenform and his treatment of it are beset with what seem to be serious flaws, chief among which is the absence of a single example of a complete movement from existing music that embodies the form. Taking the perceived weaknesses of his discussion as a starting point, I argue that they are in fact the result of an ambitious and sophisticated approach to form, which depends on a more thorough understanding of the larger body of Marx’s theory of forms, and specifically of the forms immediately preceding sonata form in Marx’s discussion. As a consequence, it is possible not only to reassess the apparent shortcomings of Marx’s original formulation but also to see sonata form itself less as a mere codification of formal elements than as a means of coming to terms with the music it considers.

Journal

Journal of Music Theory – Duke University Press

Published: Sep 21, 2011

There are no references for this article.