Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Zur Kritik der libertären Eigentumskonzeption

Zur Kritik der libertären Eigentumskonzeption Abstract Nozick’s entitlement theory of justice is, besides Rawls’s theory, one of the most widely discussed and intellectually most attractive conceptions within the field of contemporary political philosophy. Nozick’s theory uses Locke's conception of the state of nature and of natural rights, and tries, starting from this point of view, to deliver a comprehensive systematisation of libertarian political ideals. This essay deals mainly with Nozick’s conception of property rights. The argument is put forward that the concept of exclusive and unrestrictable ownership of which Nozick makes use, doesn’t find any acceptable justification on the basis of his theory. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Analyse & Kritik de Gruyter

Zur Kritik der libertären Eigentumskonzeption

Analyse & Kritik , Volume 3 (2) – Nov 1, 1981

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/zur-kritik-der-libert-ren-eigentumskonzeption-X0XCUuiRXZ

References (5)

Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by the
ISSN
0171-5860
eISSN
2365-9858
DOI
10.1515/auk-1981-0201
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract Nozick’s entitlement theory of justice is, besides Rawls’s theory, one of the most widely discussed and intellectually most attractive conceptions within the field of contemporary political philosophy. Nozick’s theory uses Locke's conception of the state of nature and of natural rights, and tries, starting from this point of view, to deliver a comprehensive systematisation of libertarian political ideals. This essay deals mainly with Nozick’s conception of property rights. The argument is put forward that the concept of exclusive and unrestrictable ownership of which Nozick makes use, doesn’t find any acceptable justification on the basis of his theory.

Journal

Analyse & Kritikde Gruyter

Published: Nov 1, 1981

There are no references for this article.