Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
AbstractThis chapter examines how Paul Tillich’s method of correlation is challenged but potentially compatible with the questioning of binaries that occurs in new materialism. In particular it examines how Karen Barad’s agential realism, and its primordial ontological unity of the ‘phenomenon’ understood as a relation without relata, disrupts the axiomatic reliance on a distinction between self and world that underpins the method of correlation specifically and many forms of correlational theology more generally. Giving weight to Tillich’s broad understanding of existentialism and its potential connection to his account of theonomy provides a way forward that gives credence to the ‘intra-action’ that has become critical to many forms of posthumanism and new materialism.
International Yearbook for Tillich Research – de Gruyter
Published: Dec 20, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.