Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
AbstractManual control of surgical instruments represents a sensorimotor control task with at least 3-6 degrees of freedom (DoF). The impact of haptic guidance on volumetric navigation tasks, such as milling of planned volumes for prosthesis fits or preserving sensitive tissues, is investigated. Interaction centered studies are performed to evaluate the usability of the assistance modes for navigation within a volume, along the surface of a volume and around forbidden regions. Results show that haptic assistance can reduce the number of constraint violations, if the virtual stiffness is high enough. However, haptic assistance also can increase error rates when counterforces are close to the absolute perception threshold, as a false sense of security can arise. For navigation along complex surfaces bilateral haptic constraints should be preferred, while unilateral constraints are sufficient for simple geometries. This study complements previous publications as a basis for a flexible rule-based selection or adaptation of modular haptic assistance systems.
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering – de Gruyter
Published: Aug 1, 2021
Keywords: Shared Control; Haptic Assistance; Cooperative Surgical Robotics
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.