Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Vaughn (1991)
Carl Menger and the Origins of Austrian EconomicsHistory of Political Economy, 23
M. Alter (1982)
Carl Menger and Homo Oeconomicus: Some Thoughts on Austrian Theory and MethodologyJournal of Economic Issues, 16
O. Gierke
Political theories of the middle age
Le Blond (1939)
Logique et méthode chez Aristote : étude sur la recherche des principes dans la physique aristotélicienne
U. Mäki (1990)
Scientific realism and Austrian explanationReview of Political Economy, 2
(1949)
De Veritate, in Quaestiones Disputatae I, Torino-Rome: Marietti
(1973)
The Place of Menger’s Grundsätze in the History of Economic Thought
Kiichiro Yagi (1997)
Carl Menger and the Historicism in Economics
Barry Smith (1994)
Aristotelianism, apriorism, essentialism
E. Kauder (1958)
Intellectual and political roots of the older Austrian schoolZeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 17
R. Cubeddu (1993)
The Philosophy of the Austrian School
Neelkant Chamilall (2000)
La Genese Du Label Autricheen': La Pensee De Carl MengerJournal des Économistes et des Études Humaines, 10
Barry Smith (1994)
The philosophy of Austrian economicsThe Review of Austrian Economics, 7
(1950)
Principles of Economics, Glencoe: The Free Press. English translation by J
Israel Kirzner (1978)
The entrepreneurial role in Menger's systemAtlantic Economic Journal, 6
(1990)
Mengerian economics in realist perspective
S. Bostaph (1978)
The methodological debate between carl menger and the german historicistsAtlantic Economic Journal, 6
“ Fonti filosofiche delle Untersuchungen über die Methode der Socialwissenschaften di Carl Menger ”
S. ChamilallNeelkant, Krecké Elisabeth (2002)
Professor Kirzner on Carl Menger: To What Extent Was Carl Menger Subjectivist?Journal Des Economistes Et Des Etudes Humaines, 12
(1986)
Austrian Economics and Austrian Philosophy”, in Wolfgang Grassl and Barry Smith (eds.), Austrian Economics. Historical and Philosophical Background, London & Sydney
(1943)
The Story of Philosophy, Garden City, NY: Garden City Publ. Co. Inc., 2nd edn
(2000)
Liberalismo económico y libertad, Madrid: Rialp
Barry Smith (1990)
Aristotle, Menger, Mises: An Essay in the Metaphysics of Economics
U. Mäki (1997)
Universals and the methodenstreit: a re-examination of Carl Menger's conception of economics as an exact scienceStudies in History and Philosophy of Science, 28
(1976)
New Light on the Prehistory of Austrian Economics”, in E. Dolan (ed.) The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics, Kansas
(1985)
Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences With Special Reference to Economics, New York and London: New York University Press, English translation by F. Nock; ed by L
(1973)
Some Themes from Investigations into Method
(1996)
Caminos Abiertos I
E. Kauder (1953)
Genesis of the Marginal Utility Theory: From Aristotle to the End of the Eighteenth CenturyThe Economic Journal, 63
Specialists often maintain that Menger has been strongly influenced by Aristotles thought ideas.This paper shows that although using Aristotles categories and general framework there are some issues in which Mengers conclusions differs from Aristotles.This hint out that Mengers knowledge of Aristotles ideas was not sufficiently deep and precise so as to completely capture its very spirit.Section two lays out the differences between Mengers conception of theoretical science applied to economics and Aristotles conception of economics as a practical science.Section three maintains that the Mengerian claim about the methodological absurdity of empirically testing the conclusions of exact research is not genuinely Aristotelian.Section four deals with the issue of Mengers concept of organic social institutions showing its differences visà- vis an Aristotelian position.Les spécialistes soutiennent souvent que Menger a été fortement influencé par la pensée dAristote.Cet article montre que, bien quempruntant les catégories et la structure générale dAristote, certaines des conclusions de Menger diffèrent de celles dAristote.Larticle suggère que la connaissance quavait Menger des idées dAristote nétait pas suffisamment approfondie et précise pour en appréhender le sens plein.La section deux présente les différences entre la conception de la science théorique présente dans léconomique de Menger et la conception aristotélicienne de léconomie comme une science pratique.La troisième section soutient que largument de Menger au sujet de labsurdité méthodologique des tests empiriques des conclusions de la recherche exacte nest pas réellement aristotélicien. La section quatre aborde la question des institutions sociales organiques chez Menger et montre ses différences vis-à-vis de la position aristotélicienne.
Journal des Économistes et des Études Humaines – de Gruyter
Published: Mar 1, 2003
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.