Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Unification of the Code Lists Provided within the Data Model Originating from the Inspire Technical Guidelines and the Ones Provided for Gesut Databases in the Context of Potential Exploitation in the Mining Industry

The Unification of the Code Lists Provided within the Data Model Originating from the Inspire... AbstractThis study is aimed at exposing differences between two data models in case of code lists values provided there. The first of them is an obligatory one for managing Geodesic Register of Utility Networks databases in Poland [9] and the second is the model originating from the Technical Guidelines issued to the INSPIRE Directive. Since the second one mentioned is the basis for managing spatial databases among European parties, correlating these two data models has an effect in easing the way of harmonizing and, in consequence, exchanging spatial data. Therefore, the study presents the possibilities of increasing compatibility between the values of the code lists concerning attributes for objects provided in both models. In practice, it could lead to an increase of the competitiveness of entities managing or processing such databases and to greater involvement in scientific or research projects when it comes to the mining industry. Moreover, since utility networks located on mining areas are under particular protection, the ability of making them more fitted to their own needs will make it possible for mining plants to exchange spatial data in a more efficient way. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Management Systems in Production Engineering de Gruyter

The Unification of the Code Lists Provided within the Data Model Originating from the Inspire Technical Guidelines and the Ones Provided for Gesut Databases in the Context of Potential Exploitation in the Mining Industry

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/the-unification-of-the-code-lists-provided-within-the-data-model-72T4a3S5Hk
Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
© 2018
eISSN
2450-5781
DOI
10.12914/mspe-06-03-2016
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractThis study is aimed at exposing differences between two data models in case of code lists values provided there. The first of them is an obligatory one for managing Geodesic Register of Utility Networks databases in Poland [9] and the second is the model originating from the Technical Guidelines issued to the INSPIRE Directive. Since the second one mentioned is the basis for managing spatial databases among European parties, correlating these two data models has an effect in easing the way of harmonizing and, in consequence, exchanging spatial data. Therefore, the study presents the possibilities of increasing compatibility between the values of the code lists concerning attributes for objects provided in both models. In practice, it could lead to an increase of the competitiveness of entities managing or processing such databases and to greater involvement in scientific or research projects when it comes to the mining industry. Moreover, since utility networks located on mining areas are under particular protection, the ability of making them more fitted to their own needs will make it possible for mining plants to exchange spatial data in a more efficient way.

Journal

Management Systems in Production Engineeringde Gruyter

Published: Sep 1, 2016

There are no references for this article.