Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Chung-hye Han (2000)
The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar
H. Lee (2012)
Embedded Imperatives in Korean and Their Implication to ParameterizationStudies in generative grammar, 22
Chung-hye Han, Chungmin Lee (2007)
On Negative Imperatives in KoreanLinguistic Inquiry, 38
The syntacticization of discourse. Ms
P. Portner (2007)
Imperatives and modalsNatural Language Semantics, 15
Peggy Speas (2011)
Configurational Properties of Point of View Roles
C. Tenny (2006)
Evidentiality, Experiencers, and the Syntax of sentience in JapaneseJournal of East Asian Linguistics, 15
(1985)
Kwukeuy myenglyengmwuney tayhaye
P. Portner, Miok Pak, R. Zanuttini (2019)
The speaker-addressee relation at the syntax-semantics interfaceLanguage, 95
L. Rizzi (1997)
The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery
(1983)
Kwukeuy 'celtaymwun'ey tayhaye [On 'absolute sentences' in Korean
Miok Pak (2008)
Types of Clauses and Sentence end Particles in KoreanKorean Linguistics, 14
A. Newell (1994)
On Declarative Sentences
(1985)
Speech act distinctions in syntax
M. Rivero, Arhonto Terzi (1995)
Imperatives, V-movement and logical moodJournal of Linguistics, 31
M. Speas (2004)
Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic featuresLingua, 114
B. Cornillie (2012)
Cognitive, interactional and textual functions of modal markers
L. Haegeman, Virginia Hill (2011)
The syntacticization of discourse
H. Lee, Jong Park (2014)
On the Syntactic Condition for Embedded ImperativesStudies in generative grammar, 24
L. Haegeman (2014)
West flemish verb‐based discourse markers and the articulation of the speech act layerStudia Linguistica, 68
(2015)
Modality.” In The handbook of Korean linguistics, ed
(1990)
Topic, modality, and IP structure.
(2007)
Embedded imperatives
AbstractThis article presents additional data in support of the fact that imperatives cannot be embedded in Korean. It demonstrates that the language employs two different types of imperative morphology: one that occurs in main clauses and the other that occurs in embedded environments, and that their occurrence is mutually exclusive. That being the case, the main imperative morphology is a bona fide illocutionary force marker that is syntactically encoded in the main clauses only, whereas the embedded imperative morphology simply serves as a clause-type indicator with no illocutionary force.
Open Linguistics – de Gruyter
Published: Feb 18, 2021
Keywords: imperative; unembeddable; clause type; speech act projection; Korean
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.