Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Semantic-Pragmatic Analysis of Persian Modal Verbs Based on Papafragou's Model

The Semantic-Pragmatic Analysis of Persian Modal Verbs Based on Papafragou's Model The Semantic-Pragmatic Analysis of Persian Modal Verbs Based on Papafragou's Model This paper aims at analyzing the semantics and pragmatics of Persian modal verbs based on Papafragou's (1998, 2000) relevance-theoretic model. Persian modals are defined in terms of logical relations and propositional domains. According to the findings of the research, two of the three modals, namely, šodan and tavân express the logical relation of compatibility with respect to different propositional domains: the three forms mišavad, mišod and mišode are unspecified with respect to their propositional domains and take them directly from the context, whereas betavân and bešavad accept the desirability domain. Mitavân also expresses compatibility in relation to the propositions in the factual domain. However, bˇyad is the only modal that encodes the logical relation of entailment and is unspecified with respect to the type of propositional domain it accepts. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Lodz Papers in Pragmatics de Gruyter

The Semantic-Pragmatic Analysis of Persian Modal Verbs Based on Papafragou's Model

Lodz Papers in Pragmatics , Volume 6 (1) – Jan 1, 2010

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/the-semantic-pragmatic-analysis-of-persian-modal-verbs-based-on-GyjCVkFOVA
Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by the
ISSN
1895-6106
eISSN
1898-4436
DOI
10.2478/v10016-010-0009-7
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The Semantic-Pragmatic Analysis of Persian Modal Verbs Based on Papafragou's Model This paper aims at analyzing the semantics and pragmatics of Persian modal verbs based on Papafragou's (1998, 2000) relevance-theoretic model. Persian modals are defined in terms of logical relations and propositional domains. According to the findings of the research, two of the three modals, namely, šodan and tavân express the logical relation of compatibility with respect to different propositional domains: the three forms mišavad, mišod and mišode are unspecified with respect to their propositional domains and take them directly from the context, whereas betavân and bešavad accept the desirability domain. Mitavân also expresses compatibility in relation to the propositions in the factual domain. However, bˇyad is the only modal that encodes the logical relation of entailment and is unspecified with respect to the type of propositional domain it accepts.

Journal

Lodz Papers in Pragmaticsde Gruyter

Published: Jan 1, 2010

There are no references for this article.