Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Félix-Brasdefer (2004)
Interlanguage Refusals: Linguistic Politeness and Length of Residence in the Target Community.Language Learning, 54
Virginia LoCastro (1998)
Learner Subjectivity and Pragmatic Competence Development.
Tomoko Takahashi, L. Beebe (2013)
THE DEVELOPMENT OF PRAGMATIC COMPETENCE BY JAPANESE LEARNERS OF ENGLISH *
(1994)
Asking for permission vs
Jenny Thomas (1983)
Cross-Cultural Pragmatic FailureApplied Linguistics, 4
Pragmatic Transferability, Satomi Takahashi (1996)
Pragmatic TransferabilityStudies in Second Language Acquisition, 18
J. Duckitt (1991)
Book Review: Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processesSouth African Journal of Psychology, 21
Yen-Hwei Lin (2005)
PARAMETER SETTING IN LANGUAGE ACQUISITIONStudies in Second Language Acquisition, 27
(1997)
Feminist practice and poststructualist theory (2nd edn.)
(1989)
Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters
(1985)
Degree of approximation: Nonnative reaction to native speech act behavior
Margaret Dufon (2008)
2. Language Socialization Theory and the Acquisition of Pragmatics in the Foreign Language Classroom
(2010)
Maintaining an optimal distance : 3 onnative speakers ’ pragmatic choice
Likun Cai, Yingli Wang (2013)
Interlanguage Pragmatics in SLATheory and Practice in Language Studies, 3
Jane Zuengler (1982)
Applying Accommodation Theory to Variable Performance Data in L2Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 4
H. Shinn (1990)
A survey of sociolinguistic studies in Korea, 1990
L. Beebe, H. Giles (1984)
Speech-accommodation theories: a discussion in terms of second-language acquisition, 1984
N. Vito (1993)
Second culture acquisition: a tentative step in determining hierarchies, 1992
M. Keshavarz, Z. Rasekh (2006)
PRAGMATIC TRANSFER AND IRANIAN EFL REFUSALS: A CROSS-CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE OF PERSIAN ENGLISH, 11
Mary Mcgroarty (1998)
Constructive and Constructivist Challenges for Applied LinguisticsLanguage Learning, 48
Meryl Siegal (1996)
The Role of Learner Subjectivity in Second Language Sociolinguistic Competency: Western Women Learning Japanese.Applied Linguistics, 17
(1988)
Sociolinguistic perspective: Five sociolinguistic approaches to second language acquisition
Virginia LoCastro (2001)
Individual differences in second language acquisition: attitudes, learner subjectivity, and L2 pragmatic normsSystem, 29
S. Gass, Alison Mackey (2000)
Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research
Zohreh Eslami-Rasekh (2005)
Raising the pragmatic awareness of language learnersElt Journal, 59
Naoko Taguchi (2009)
Subjectivity and pragmatic choice in L2 Japanese: Emulating and resisting pragmatic norms
René Coppieters, Hugh Adamson, René Coppieters (1988)
Variation Theory and Second Language Acquisition
S. Mckay, S. Wong (1996)
Multiple Discourses, Multiple Identities: Investment and Agency in Second-Language Learning among Chinese Adolescent Immigrant Students.Harvard Educational Review, 66
Virginia High (2003)
An introduction to pragmatics : social action for language teachers
H. Giles, N. Coupland, J. Coupland (1991)
Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence.
J. Hall (2002)
Teaching and Researching: Language and Culture
Eli Hinkel (1996)
When in Rome: Evaluations of L2 pragmalinguistic behaviors☆Journal of Pragmatics, 26
(2001)
Empirical evidence of the need for instruction in pragmatics
(1989)
Speech act behavior across languages
(1991)
‘ Deference ’ vs . ‘ politeness ’ in Korean speech
Elinor Ochs (1993)
Constructing Social Identity: A Language Socialization PerspectiveResearch on Language and Social Interaction, 26
C. Paulston (1978)
Biculturalism: Some Reflections and SpeculationsTESOL Quarterly, 12
Montserrat Mir-Fernandez (1994)
The use of English requests by native Spanish speakers and its relation to politeness values
Abstract The main goal of this study was to identify factors motivating pragmatic transfer in advanced learners of English. Based on a cross-cultural comparison of requesting behavior between Koreans and Americans, this study determined the impact of individual subjective motives on pragmatic language choice. Two different groups of subjects participated in this study: 30 Korean participants (KK) and 30 American college students (AE). Data were collected by using a Discourse Completion Task (DCT). Korean (KK) participants provided the data for Korean (KK) and English versions of DCT (KE). Semi-structured interviews were also conducted with 13 Korean ESL learners who showed the most and least amount of pragmatic transfer. Findings showed evidence of pragmatic transfer in the request responses given by Korean ESL learners in their requestive strategies, level of directness, and perspectives of head acts. The interview data revealed that Korean students were conscious of differing rules for making requests. Learners’ judgment of L2 pragmatic norms, perception of their own language, and their attitudes of the target language influence language use. Furthermore, findings showed that purpose of learning English, different types of motivation, and the length of intended residence contribute to the extent of pragmatic transfer
Lodz Papers in Pragmatics – de Gruyter
Published: Jun 1, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.