Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1960)
On the Comparative Treatment of Economic Institutions in Antiquity with Illustrations from Athens, Mycenae, and Alalakh, University of Chicago Press
J. Metcalfe (2004)
The entrepreneur and the style of modern economicsJournal of Evolutionary Economics, 14
M. Harvey, S. Randles (2002)
Markets, the Organisation of Exchanges and « Instituted economic process » - An Analytical Perspective, 101
S. Randles (2002)
Market exchanges &'Instituted Economic Process' an analytical perspective
M. Harvey, A. McMeekin, S. Randles, D. Southerton, B. Tether, A. Warde (2001)
BETWEEN DEMAND & CONSUMPTION: A FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCH
R. Webber (1969)
Covent Garden: mud-salad market
B. Loasby (1999)
Knowledge, institutions, and evolution in economics
O. Mayr (1983)
Revolution in Time: Clocks and the Making of the Modern World by David S. Landes (review)Technology and Culture, 26
J. Harvey, R. Webber (1972)
Market gardening: The history of commercial flower, fruit and vegetable growing
(1957)
Report of the Committee on Horticultural Marketing , HMSO , Parliamentary Papers
J. Schumpeter, Ursula Backhaus (2017)
The Theory of Economic Development
U. Witt (1998)
Imagination and leadership – The neglected dimension of an evolutionary theory of the firmJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 35
Israel Kirzner (1974)
Competition and Entrepreneurship
A. Warde, M. Tomlinson, A. McMeekin (2000)
Expanding Tastes? Cultural Omnivorousness & Social Change in the Uk
S. Metcalfe, A. Warde (2018)
Market relations and the competitive process
R. Nelson (2003)
On the complexities and limits of market organizationReview of International Political Economy, 10
E. Chamberlin (1947)
The theory of monopolistic competition : a re-orientation of the theory of valueEconomica, 14
(1966)
Dahomey and the Slave Trade
M. Harvey (2005)
Markets, supermarkets and the macro-social shaping of demand: an instituted economic process approach
Donald MacKenzie (2003)
Long-Term Capital Management and the sociology of arbitrageEconomy and Society, 32
M. Harvey, S. Quilley, H. Beynon (2002)
Exploring the tomato: transformations in nature, economy and society
J. Metcalfe, R. Ramlogan (2005)
Limits to the economy of knowledge and knowledge of the economyFutures, 37
(1979)
Collected Economic Papers, Volume Five
Carl Trocki (2000)
Opium, Empire and the Global Political Economy: A Study of the Asian Opium Trade 1750-1950
F. Heichelheim, K. Polanyi, C. Arensberg, H. Pearson (1960)
Trade and Market in the Early EmpiresJournal of The Economic and Social History of The Orient, 3
G. Skinner (1964)
Marketing and Social Structure in Rural China, Part IIIThe Journal of Asian Studies, 24
K. Polanyi, J. Stiglitz, F. Block (2001)
The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time
(1979)
The Wheels of Commerce: Vol II Civilisation and Capitalism
G. Dalton (1968)
Primitive, archaic and modern economies : essays of Karl Polanyi
U. Witt (2003)
The Evolving Economy
(1998)
Transplanting The Garden: The Story of the Relocation of Covent Garden
G. Skinner (1964)
Marketing and Social Structure in Rural China, Part IThe Journal of Asian Studies, 24
(1985)
The Market Town’, in Thirsk
(1999)
The Potato, London: Macmillan
(2005)
Making Sense of Institutions as a Factor Shaping Economic PerformanceTechnology, Institutions, and Economic Growth
This paper brings about a conversation between Schumpeterian and Polanyian perspectives on markets and their central role in the capitalist economy. For Schumpeter, markets were critical to the process of selftransformation of economic activity, but in his vision, markets as such were largely taken for granted. Markets enabled the introduction of new processes and products equally as well as rendering economic activities obsolete, with the entrepreneur and firm as agents of change, generating new combinations of activities and driven by the creative power of knowledge. Innovation and markets are jointly the engines of endogenous growth. For Karl Polanyi, by contrast, although markets were the central feature of the capitalist economy from the beginning of the nineteenth century, his main interest is the constant impulse for markets as institutions to expand into every aspect of social life and the countermovement of regulation to restrain what he sees as their essentially destructive nature. His focus is therefore on markets as instituted economic processes, driven by the double movement of regulation (order) and de-regulation (disorder). He scarcely considers innovation in production or consumption, concentrating on institutions of exchange and distribution. The paper explores the two perspectives in order to ask the question that their confrontation raises: What is the relation between intra-market endogenous change and marketframework institutional change? To test out each perspective, a schematic long-duration empirical account of the United Kingdom food distribution markets is subjected to a Schumpeterian and Polanyian reading, and each is exposed for complementary deficits. A broader explanatory framework is sketched that proposes analysis of innovation in market institutions--especially processes exchange and distribution-- in combination with innovation in production and consumption. It is suggested that to explore the constant change of capitalist economies, these four economic domains each involve different orders of innovation and transformation that have complex feedbacks and interactions with each other. Rather than according primacy to one or other order of change (as did Schumpeter and Polanyi in their respective ways), we require a complex causal account embracing multiple instituted economic processes.Cet article discute de la vision des marchés et de leur rôle central dans léconomie capitaliste selon Schumpeter et Polanyi. Pour Schumpeter, les marchés sont essentiels au processus dauto transformation de lactivité économique, mais dans son approche il présuppose lexistence des marchés . Les marchés permettent lintroduction de nouveaux processus et produits et rendent en même temps les activités économiques obsolètes. Les marchés, avec lentrepreneur et la firme comme agents du changement, créent de nouvelles combinaisons dactivités et sont dynamisés par le pouvoir créatif de la connaissance. Linnovation et les marchés sont conjointement les moteurs de la croissance endogène. Chez Karl Polanyi, en revanche, bien que les marchés soient un élément central de léconomie capitaliste dès le début du 19ème siècle, lattention se porte sur le mouvement permament des marchés-institutions à sétendre à tous les domaines de la vie sociale ainsi que sur le contre-mouvement de la régulation à limiter ce que Polanyi considère comme la nature destructrice des marchés. Son interêt se porte ainsi aux marchés comme des processus économiques établis, conduits par un double mouvement de régulation (ordre) et de dérégulation (désordre). Il ne considère que rarement linnovation de production ou de consommation, et se concentre sur les institutions de léchange et de la distribution.Larticle explore les deux visions afin de sinterroger sur ce que la confrontation des approches soulève comme question: Quelle est la relation entre les changements endogènes intra marché et les changements institutionnels de la structure de marché? Pour tester chacune des visions, un compte-rendu empirique sur longue période de la distribution alimentaire au Royaume-Uni est soumis à une lecture Schumpeterienne et Polanyienne.Un cadre explicatif plus large est esquissé et suggère une analyse de linnovation des institutions de marché - particulièrement des processus déchange et de distribution - conjointement à linnovation de production et de consommation. Il est suggéré que pour analyser le changement permanent des économies capitalistes, il faut considérer les ordres dinnovation et de transformation de ces quatres domaines économiques qui connaissent des effets de retour ainsi des interactions. Au lieu daccorder la primauté à un des ordres de changement (ce que Schumpeter et Polanyi ont fait), il est nécessaire de rendre compte dune causalité complexe qui prend en compte des processus économiques multiples.
Journal des Économistes et des Études Humaines – de Gruyter
Published: Dec 1, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.