Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The ‘Meta’-significance of Scalia’s A Matter of Interpretation: Reflections on a Theory and Ethics of Judicial Legislative Power

The ‘Meta’-significance of Scalia’s A Matter of Interpretation: Reflections on a Theory and... AbstractThe article focuses on a metatheory of legal interpretation as provided or implied in Antonin Scalia’s famous essay A Matter of Interpretation. It is not so much textualism itself what is being analysed here as its theoretical and philosophical foundations. Following this route, the article reveals a complex ideological framework of intersections between domains of democracy, common law, stare decisis, jusnaturalism and juspositivism. By moving judicial legislative power to the forefront, the analysis opens up the existence of two rather different, if not opposite, legislative strategies in the contemporary government: a regular one, exercised by its political institutions (parliament being the main one), and a specific one, exercised by the judiciary. The article proceeds with a critical analysis of two justifications of the latter—one more formal and another more substantial. Finally, the article develops a basic practical hierarchical structure of principles or rules that should settle down legislative powers by neutralising the apparent fundamental contradiction in Scalia’s essay (i.e., being pro-democrat and pro-liberal at the same time). http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Baltic Journal of European Studies de Gruyter

The ‘Meta’-significance of Scalia’s A Matter of Interpretation: Reflections on a Theory and Ethics of Judicial Legislative Power

Berkmanas, Tomas
Baltic Journal of European Studies , Volume 10 (1): 22 – Jun 1, 2020
Download PDF
22 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/de-gruyter/the-meta-significance-of-scalia-s-a-matter-of-interpretation-4XfiKu0uHv

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
de Gruyter
Copyright
© 2020 Tomas Berkmanas, published by Sciendo
ISSN
2228-0596
eISSN
2674-4619
DOI
10.1515/bjes-2020-0009
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractThe article focuses on a metatheory of legal interpretation as provided or implied in Antonin Scalia’s famous essay A Matter of Interpretation. It is not so much textualism itself what is being analysed here as its theoretical and philosophical foundations. Following this route, the article reveals a complex ideological framework of intersections between domains of democracy, common law, stare decisis, jusnaturalism and juspositivism. By moving judicial legislative power to the forefront, the analysis opens up the existence of two rather different, if not opposite, legislative strategies in the contemporary government: a regular one, exercised by its political institutions (parliament being the main one), and a specific one, exercised by the judiciary. The article proceeds with a critical analysis of two justifications of the latter—one more formal and another more substantial. Finally, the article develops a basic practical hierarchical structure of principles or rules that should settle down legislative powers by neutralising the apparent fundamental contradiction in Scalia’s essay (i.e., being pro-democrat and pro-liberal at the same time).

Journal

Baltic Journal of European Studies – de Gruyter

Published: Jun 1, 2020

Keywords: Antonin Scalia; A Matter of Interpretation; judicial legislation; legal interpretation; stare decisis

There are no references for this article.