Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Vanessa Williamson, T. Skocpol, J. Coggin (2011)
The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican ConservatismPerspectives on Politics, 9
Shelley Boulianne (2009)
Does Internet Use Affect Engagement? A Meta-Analysis of ResearchPolitical Communication, 26
Schneider (2006)
Foot Web Campaigning MIT
Markus (2007)
Prior Post - Broadcast Democracy : How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections New York : Cambridge University
Bruce Bimber, L. Copeland (2013)
Digital Media and Traditional Political Participation Over Time in the U.S.Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10
Howard (2006)
New Media and the Managed New York University
W. Phillips (2012)
Self-Organized Complexity and Coherent Infomax from the Viewpoint of Jaynes's Probability TheoryInf., 3
(2011)
TheNew YorkTimes.http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/17/opinion/beware-the-big-data- campaign
Hindman (2009)
The Myth of Digital Democracy Princeton Princeton University
I. Lakatos (1976)
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
Finn Brunton (2013)
Spam: A Shadow History of the Internet
Magdalena Wojcieszak (2011)
Deliberation and Attitude PolarizationJournal of Communication, 61
John (2011)
Sides The The Political Economy of Campaign Fundraising in the Internet Paper presentation Annual Meeting ChicagoAge Political Science Association IL
Turow (2011)
The You MIT
Jamieson (2010)
Echo and the Conservative Media Establishment New University
Politics Research Agenda
B. Williams, M. Carpini (2011)
After Broadcast News: Media Regimes, Democracy, and the New Information Environment
Karpf (2012)
a The Effect The Unexpected Transformation of American Advocacy New York Oxford University
Nyhan (2012)
The Entirely Predictable Failure of Americans http www cjr org united states project americans elect predictable failure phpElect Columbia Journalism Review
Cristian Vaccari, R. Nielsen (2013)
What Drives Politicians' Online Popularity? An Analysis of the 2010 U.S. Midterm ElectionsJournal of Information Technology & Politics, 10
C. Sunstein (2007)
Republic.com 2.0
Vaccari (2013)
What Drives Politicians Online Popularity An Analysis of the Midterm Elections of http www tandfonline com doi fullJournal Information Technology Politics, 10
D. Béland (2012)
The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism , Theda Skocpol and Vanessa Williamson, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. xii, 245.Canadian Journal of Political Science, 45
Rosenstone (1993)
Participation Democracy in New York ClassicsMobilization
Aaron Shaw, Y. Benkler (2012)
A Tale of Two BlogospheresAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 56
(2010)
MassMediaandAmericanPolitics,8 th Edition
M. Fiorina, S. Abrams, J. Pope (2004)
Culture War?: The Myth of a Polarized America
Tufecki (2012)
Beware the Smart Campaign Op Ed The New York Times http www nytimes com opinion beware the big data campaign html
S. Rosenstone, J. Hansen (1993)
Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America
Schudson (1998)
The Good UniversityHarvard
Williams (2012)
After Broadcast News Media Regimes Democracy the New New York Cambridge UniversityInformation Environment
Green (2000)
The Effects of Canvassing Telephone Calls and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout Field ExperimentAmerican Political Science Review
Masket (2011)
No Middle Ground : How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures MI University of MichiganAnn Arbor
M. Hindman (2008)
The Myth of Digital Democracy
Lentz (2002)
Electing Third Party Success Story Boulder CO
R. Nielsen (2011)
Mundane internet tools, mobilizing practices, and the coproduction of citizenship in political campaignsNew Media & Society, 13
Schlozman (2012)
The Chorus Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy Princeton Princeton University
J. Druckman, Martin Kifer, Michael Parkin (2009)
Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 103
(2011)
DeliberationandAttitudePolarization:Whathappens whenpeoplewithextremeviewsencounterdisagreement
Lakatos (1970)
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes InCriticism and the Growth of Knowledge : Proceedings of the International Colloquium on the Philosophy of edited by New York : Cambridge UniversityScience
(2009)
Netroots:OnlineProgressivesandtheTransformationof AmericanPolitics.Boulder,CO:ParadigmPublishers. CFI/BPC Working Group on Money-in-Politics Research Agenda Kreiss
Malbin (2013)
Money vs Money Plus Post - Election Reports Reveal Two Different Campaign Strategies Media Release Campaign Finance Institute
(2012)
TheMoveOnEffect:TheUnexpectedTransformationofAmerican PolitcanAdvocacy.NewYork:OxfordUniversityPress Karpf
A. Abramowitz (2010)
The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy
Karine Nahon, Jeff Hemsley, Shawn Walker, M. Hussain (2010)
Fifteen Minutes of Fame: The Place of Blogs in the Life Cycle of Viral Political Information
Bruce Bimber, Andrew Flanagin, C. Stohl (2012)
Collective Action in Organizations: Contents
Putnam (2000)
Alone The Collapse and Revival of Community New YorkAmerican
(2011)
NicheNews:ThePoliticsofNewsChoice.NewYork: OxfordUniversityPress
Robert Bond, Christopher Fariss, Jason Jones, Adam Kramer, Cameron Marlow, Jaime Settle, J. Fowler (2012)
A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilizationNature, 489
Chris Peters (2012)
The daily you: How the new advertising industry is defining your identity and your worthNew Media & Society, 16
Bimber (2012)
Collective Action in Organizations New York University
D. Green, A. Gerber (2004)
Get Out the Vote!: How to Increase Voter Turnout
Bonica (2011)
Adam Donors Polarization http www bostonreview net bonica small donors polarizationSmall Review
Stroud (2011)
Natalie Niche News The of News Choice New York UniversityPolitics
Schlozman (2010)
Weapon of the Strong Participatory Inequality and the Internet Perspectives onPolitics, 8
Skocpol (2012)
Vanessa The Tea Party and The Remaking of Republican Conservatism New York University
Matthew (2009)
Kerbel Online Progressives and the Transformation of Boulder CO Paradigm PublishersAmerican Politics
Kreiss (2012)
Taking Our Country Back The Crafting of Networked Politics from Howard to Obama New York University
Kuhn (1962)
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Chicago University of ChicagoIL
D. Karpf (2011)
Open Source Political Community Development: A Five-Stage Adoption ProcessJournal of Information Technology & Politics, 8
R. Putnam (2000)
Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community
Brunton (2013)
Spam Shadow of the Internet MI MITHistory
Karpf (2012)
in Internet TimeSocial Science Research Methods Information Communication Society, 15
(2010)
Weaponofthe Strong?ParticipatoryInequalityandtheInternet
K. Schlozman, S. Verba, Henry Brady (2012)
The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy
Issenberg (2012)
The NewLab
Daniel Kreiss (2012)
Taking Our Country Back: The Crafting of Networked Politics from Howard Dean to Barack Obama
Bond (2012)
Million Person Experiment in Social Influence and Political http www nature com nature abs html supplementary informationMobilization Nature journal nature
Jacob Lentz (2001)
Electing Jesse Ventura: A Third-Party Success Story
(2012)
TheVictoryLab.NewYork:Crown
N. Stroud (2011)
Niche News: The Politics of News Choice
(2011)
NoMiddleGround:HowInformalPartyOrganizationsControl NominationsandPolarizeLegislatures
(1962)
TheStructureofScientificRevolutions.Chicago,IL:Universityof ChicagoPress
Cohen (2009)
The Party Decides Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform Chicago University of ChicagoIL
T. Kuhn, David Hawkins (1963)
The Structure of Scientific RevolutionsAmerican Journal of Physics, 31
Lazer (2009)
ComputationalSocial Science Science
M. Kerbel (2009)
Netroots: Online Progressives and the Transformation of American Politics
Nielsen (2011)
Mundane Internet Tools Mobilizing Practices and the Coproduction of Citizenship in Political Campaigns New Media andSociety, 13
Bimber (2003)
Campaigning New York UniversityOnline
Aaron (2012)
Tale of Two Blogospheres Discursive Practices on the Left and RightShaw American Behavioral Scientist
D. Lazer, A. Pentland, Lada Adamic, Sinan Aral, A. Barabási, Devon Brewer, N. Christakis, N. Contractor, J. Fowler, M. Gutmann, T. Jebara, Gary King, M. Macy, D. Roy, Marshall Alstyne (2009)
Computational Social ScienceScience, 323
Mutz (2006)
Hearing the Other Side Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy New York Cambridge University
Abramowitz (2010)
The Disappearing Engaged Citizens Polarization Democracy New Yale UniversityAmerican
Marty Cohen, David Karol, Hans Noel, J. Zaller (2008)
The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform
Markus Prior (2003)
Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections
(2013)
Moneyvs.Money-Plus:Post-ElectionReports RevealTwoDifferentCampaignStrategies
Green (2012)
The Behind Those Obama Fundraising Emails BusinessWeek http www businessweek com articles the science behind those obama campaign e mailsScience
K. Jamieson, J. Cappella (2008)
Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment
M. Schudson (1998)
The good citizen
Fung
Forthcoming Viral Engagement Seminar SeriesHarvard
John Sides, Henry Farrell (2010)
The Kos Bump: The Political Economy of Campaign Fundraising in the Internet AgeMicroeconomics: Search; Learning; Information Costs & Specific Knowledge; Expectation & Speculation eJournal
Diana Mutz (2006)
Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy
Barzilai (2011)
Fifteen Minutes of Fame : The Place of Blogs in the Life Cycle of Viral Political Policy InternetInformation, 3
(2006)
WebCampaigning.Cambridge,MA:MITPress Fung,Archon.(Forthcoming) HarvardSeminarSeries
D. Karpf (2010)
Macaca Moments Reconsidered: Electoral Panopticon or Netroots Mobilization?Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7
Fiorina (2005)
Culture War The Myth of a Polarized America New York
Abstract This article provides an overview of major research findings regarding the Internet and American political campaigns. This is still a nascent subfield, but the research community has come to general agreement on five key points: (1) at the mass behavioral level, the Internet has not changed fundamental participatory inequalities; (2) we have seen an increase in small-donor activity, and these donations tend to flow toward polarizing candidates; (3) for political campaign operations, “mundane mobilization tools” carry the largest impacts; (4) with political campaigns, the new focus on data analytics and the “culture of testing” is substantially changing resource expenditures and work routines; and (5) there is currently a clear partisan divide between how Democrats and Republicans employ digital technology for campaigning. The article also discusses the methodological challenges that separate Internet-related research from many of the more established fields of campaign finance-related research. It concludes by posing a set of research questions for the 2014 and 2016 election cycles which will likely prove fruitful.
The Forum – de Gruyter
Published: Oct 1, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.