Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
João Rosa, C. Teixeira, J. Pinto (2013)
Risk factors in e-justice information systemsGov. Inf. Q., 30
Edita Gruodytė (2014)
The Disciplinary Liability of Lithuanian Lawyers: a Comparative ApproachBaltic Journal of Law & Politics, 7
(2016)
Teisininkų etika: nuo status quo pavyzdinio modelio link [Legal ethics: from status quo towards exemplary model
(2006)
VAIČELIŪNAITĖ , Gabija . A . Dobryninas : Apie Pasitikėjimą Teismais Ir Požiūrį į Valstybę [ A . Dobryninas . About Trust in Justice and Attitude to the State ]
S. Grimmelikhuijsen, Albert Klijn (2015)
THE EFFECTS OF JUDICIAL TRANSPARENCY ON PUBLIC TRUST: EVIDENCE FROM A FIELD EXPERIMENTPublic Administration, 93
Timothy Fogarty (1990)
Case Western Reserve University
Jenny Licht (2011)
Do We Really Want to Know? The Potentially Negative Effect of Transparency in Decision Making on Perceived LegitimacyScandinavian Political Studies, 34
(2018)
There Are Three Kinds of Lies: Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics – the Meaning and Origin of This Phrase
Marc Bühlmann, R. Kunz (2011)
Confidence in the Judiciary: Comparing the Independence and Legitimacy of Judicial SystemsWest European Politics, 34
D. Curtin, A. Meijer (2006)
Does transparency strengthen legitimacy?Inf. Polity, 11
(2005)
The Role of Information Technology in Modernising the Courts. [online]. Presented to a Conference of the Southern African Judges Commission, Uganda
Agota Raišienė, Steponas Jonušauskas (2013)
Informacinių ir komunikacinių technologijų įtaka darbuotojų technostresui: situacijos Lietuvoje charakteristikaImmunotechnology, 66
T. Tyler (2001)
Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: What do majority and minority group members want from the law and legal institutions?Behavioral sciences & the law, 19 2
Dory Reiling (2010)
Technology for Justice: How Information Technology can support Judicial Reform
(2019)
Sociologas: atsistatyti gyventojų pasitikėjimui teismais užtruks, [Sociologist: It will take time to restore the confidence of the people in the courts
Aylin Çakır, Eser Şekercioğlu (2016)
Public confidence in the judiciary: the interaction between political awareness and level of democracyDemocratization, 23
(2013)
Lithuanian organizations
Timothy Peters, Karen Crawley (2017)
Envisioning Legality: Law, Culture and Representation
Dirk-Hinnerk Fischer (2016)
Making a Mark—Time Changing Politics from Estonia: An Alternative Idea for the British, Bulgarian and Estonian EU PresidencyBaltic Journal of European Studies, 6
Paul Carrington (1992)
Butterfly Effects: The Possibilities of Law Teaching in a DemocracyDuke Law Journal, 41
M. Hough, Mai Sato (2011)
Trust in justice: why it is important for criminal policy, and how it can be measured
(2012)
Pasitikėjimo Lietuvos Teisėsauga Profiliai [Profiles of Trust in Lithuanian Law Enforcement
Julija Kiršienė (2015)
TRIMATĖ TEISININKO PROFESIJOS KRIZĖS PROBLEMA, 22
(2018)
Naujausios Apklausos: Rekordinis Pasitikėjimas Teismais [Latest Surveys: Record Trust in Courts
(2019)
A comparative analysis of disciplinary systems for European judges and prosecutors
(2017)
Teisininko profesija ir etika: riba tarp teisės ir moralės
E. Welch, C. Hinnant, M. Moon (2004)
Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in GovernmentJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15
Thomas Taylor (1990)
Why People Obey the Law
Edita Gruodytė, Tomas Berkmanas, Julija Kiršienė, Stefan Kirchner, Silvija Gervienė, Charles Szymanski, Simona Žižienė, Tomas Veršinskas, V. Malinauskas (2016)
Legal Ethics: From Status Quo Towards Ideal Model: Collective Monograph (Teisininkų Etika: Nuo Status Quo Pavyzdinio Modelio Link: Kolektyvinė Monografija) (Conclusion)
J. Gibson, Gregory Caldeira (2009)
Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations: Positivity Theory and the Judgments of the American People
SummaryUntil 2018 public trust in judiciary in Lithuania was more negative than positive. Results of 2018 are exceptional as show the highest rates of trust in 22 years. The aim of this article – to find out if these results are coincidence or indicate increase of public trust in judiciary. To explore this issue this paper will analyze the concept and dynamics of trust in judiciary, possible measures of professionalism and examine how these aspects are reflected in Lithuanian judiciary. Our research reveals two main reasons for the improved trust in the judiciary: good performance including use of technology and greater transparency that provides the public greater access to information about the justice system.
International and Comparative Law Review – de Gruyter
Published: Jun 1, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.